DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854.

348 citing documents.

  • State v. Amundson 712 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    After the district court denied his motion to suppress the evidence seized in the search, Amundson agreed to waive his right to a
  • State v. Davis 711 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    Davis then entered a not-guilty plea, and was found guilty of controlled-substance crimes for possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia.
  • State v. Kouba 709 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Kouba 709 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Schuster 709 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Schuster 709 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Raines 709 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Raines 709 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    *276 (1980), and was found guilty of first-degree controlled-substanee crimes.
  • State v. Mahr 701 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Mahr 701 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    1 (2002) (conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine), following a
  • State v. Johnson 689 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Johnson 689 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    Appellant waived his right to a
  • State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    On April 29, 2008, Prax agreed to a
  • State v. McDonnell 686 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. McDonnell 686 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    The case was submitted to the district court for a and the district court found McDonnell guilty of first-degree driving while impaired.
  • State v. Bergh 679 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Pedersen 679 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Bergh 679 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Pedersen 679 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    The ease was tried to the court on stipulated facts, and appellant was convicted of felony controlled substance crime in the fifth degree.
  • O'MEARA v. State 679 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 2004
  • O'MEARA v. State 679 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Kier 678 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Kier 678 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    FACTS This is an appeal from a
  • State v. LaRose 673 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. LaRose 673 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    (allowing a defendant to preserve pre-trial issue for appeal by stipulating to evidence and submitting to a bench trial).
  • State v. Riley 667 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Riley 667 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    and the state dismissed the remaining charges.
  • State v. Tracy 667 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Tracy 667 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    a defendant may preserve pretrial issues for appellate review by entering a plea of not guilty, waiving the right to a jury trial, and then stipulating to the prosecution’s case.
  • State v. Henning 666 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Henning 666 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2003
    Appellant, agreed to stipulate to the facts contained within the police reports and his certified driving record.
  • State v. Iverson 664 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Iverson 664 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Manypenny 662 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Manypenny 662 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    After the parties agreed to a the district court found appellant guilty of all three charged offenses.
  • State v. Grillo 661 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Syhavong 661 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Syhavong 661 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    Syhavong waived his right to a
  • State v. Grillo 661 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Bergerson 659 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Bergerson 659 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    The state dismissed the latter charge, and the case was submitted on stipulated facts
  • State v. LORSUNG 658 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. LORSUNG 658 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    Appellant waived her right to a
  • State v. Smith 656 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Smith 656 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    Appellants concede that the statutory construction issue is determinative of the prosecution, to expedite appellate review.
  • State v. McLellan 655 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. McLellan 655 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    The parties agreed to submit the matter to the district court on stipulated facts
  • State v. Collins 655 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Collins 655 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2003