DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854.

348 citing documents.

  • State v. Goebel 654 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Goebel 654 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    In a appellant was convicted of sale of a controlled substance — 10 grams or more— in violation of Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    In a bench trial following a -58 (Minn.1980), the district court convicted appellant of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree pursuant to Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Stoskopf 644 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Stoskopf 644 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    Stoskopf waived his right to a see Minn. R.Crim.
  • State v. Busse 644 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2002
  • State v. Busse 644 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2002
  • In re the Welfare of R.J.E. 642 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 2002
  • In Re RJE 642 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 2002
  • In Re RJE 642 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 2002
    pled not guilty and agreed to a delinquency hearing on stipulated facts
  • In re the Welfare of R.J.E. 642 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 2002
    pled not guilty and agreed to a delinquency hearing on stipulated facts
  • State v. Webster 642 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Webster 642 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    Each waived the right to a jury trial and submitted the case to the district court on stipulated facts
  • State v. Torgrimson 637 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Torgrimson 637 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    Tor-grimson waived his right to a jury trial and *347
  • State v. Palmer 636 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Palmer 636 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    the parties stipulated to the facts and tried the case to the court.
  • State v. Kua Vang 636 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Kua Vang 636 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and submitted the case to the court on stipulated facts
  • State v. Frazier 631 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Frazier 631 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    ANALYSIS I. The state, contends that appellant forfeited his right to contest the constitutionality of Minn.Stat.
  • In Re the Welfare of R.J.E. 630 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • In Re the Welfare of R.J.E. 630 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    The matter was tried on stipulated facts consisting of pertinent police reports, including the statement of the victim
  • Garza v. State 632 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2001
  • Garza v. State 632 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2001
  • Garza v. State 619 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • Garza v. State 619 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Johnson 617 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Johnson 617 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    OPINION KLAPHAKE, Judge Appellant Tijuan Donte Johnson was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and second-degree assault following a bench trial on stipulated facts
  • State v. Baumann 616 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Baumann 616 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    Baumann pleaded not guilty, stipulated to the facts, and agreed to a bench trial.
  • State v. Busse 616 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Busse 616 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    Busse entered a -58 (Minn.1980), and now appeals the district court’s determination that it had jurisdiction over the charged offense.
  • Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 612 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2000
  • Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 612 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2000
    (holding that we will address issues raised by appellant despite technical errors under circumstances where the interest in judicial economy so demands); 6 , 660 (Minn.1984).
  • State v. Olson 609 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Olson 609 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    On March 10, 1998, Olson stipulated to the state’s
  • State v. Wolf 605 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 2000
  • Followed State v. Wolf 605 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 2000
    allow Wolfs expert to testify to the “Widmark” formula or *384 other “extrapolation” testimony because, in this case, the “potential for unfair prejudice outweighs the probative value of [such] testimony.” On the eve of the January 1998 trial date, Wolf waived his right to a
  • State v. Uber 604 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Uber 604 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    Uber waived his right to a jury, and the district court conducted a
  • State v. Coauette 601 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Coauette 601 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    (stating that, for judicial economy, defendant may plead not guilty and then submit stipulated record for bench trial).
  • State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Verschelde 595 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Verschelde 595 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1999
    After the trial court denied appellant's motion to dismiss the complaint, appellant waived his right to a -58 (Minn.1980).
  • State v. Munson 594 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Munson 594 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1999
    Munson waived his right to a thereby preserving the evidentiary issues for appeal.