Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of DeLa Rosa v. DeLa Rosa, 309 N.W.2d 755.

71 citing documents.

Sylvester L. Zurn, individually and as beneficiary of the Sylvester L. Zurn Trust, dated December 30, 2002, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 755, 758 (Minn. 1981).
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(making equitable award of property to former spouse of medical student for financial support provided during medical school).
Deborah Saxhaug, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jude Med., Inc., v. Carte r
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Wife first cites DeLa Rosa v. DeLa Rosa, for the proposition that district courts have “inherent power to grant equitable relief as the facts in each particular case and the ends of justice may require.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Richard Leo Bassing, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Even though a district court’s authority “is limited to that provided for by [the marriage-dissolution] statute, the district courts are guided by equitable principles in determining the rights and liabilities of the parties upon a dissolution 5 of the marriage relationship.” -78 (Minn. 1981) (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(citing DeLa Rosa v. DeLa Rosa , d 755, 758 (Minn. 1981)).
In re the Marriage of: Thomas W. Krabbenhoft, petitioner, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2020
has inherent power to grant equitable relief as the facts in each particular case and the ends of justice may require.” DeLa Rosa v. DeLa Rosa , , 758 (Minn. 1981) (quotation omitted).
St. Jude Med., Inc. v. Carter 913 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 2018
St. Jude Med., Inc. v. Carter 913 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 2018
See, e.g. , DeLa Rosa v. DeLa Rosa , , 758 (Minn. 1981) (explaining that a court has "inherent power to grant equitable relief" based on the facts and circumstances of the individual case).
In re the Marriage of: Andrew James Carl Trupe v. Christin Marie Sohns Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Distinguished In re the Marriage of: Andrew James Carl Trupe v. Christin Marie Sohns Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 755, 758 (Minn. 1981) (applying an abuse of discretion standard to the district court’s equitable award).
In re the Marriage of: Martha Jean Abbott v. James William Abbott Ladner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Martha Jean Abbott v. James William Abbott Ladner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
2d 501, 503 (Minn. 1989) (noting that the district court is a third party to dissolution proceedings and has the “duty to protect the interests of both parties and all the citizens of the state to ensure that the stipulation is fair and reasonable to all”); -58 (Minn. 1981) (“Although dissolution is a statutory action and the authority of the [district] court is limited to that provided for by statute, the district courts are guided by equitable principles in determining the rights and liabiliti
Marriage of Gossman v. Gossman 847 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bauerly v. Bauerly 765 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Bauerly v. Bauerly 765 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(stating that a district court has inherent power to grant equitable relief).
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating district court’s equitable jurisdiction gives court “inherent power to grant equitable relief’).
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Minnesota courts have invoked their inherent power to grant equitable relief “as the facts in each particular case and the ends of justice may require.” Johnston v. Johnston, 280 Minn. 81, 86 , (finding district court has inherent power in family law cases to grant relief as facts and equities require); State ex rel.
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(in family cases, the district court has inherent power to grant relief as facts and equities require).
Marriage of Frauenshuh v. Giese 599 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1999
Marriage of Frauenshuh v. Giese 599 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1999
At the same time, the role of the courts in dissolution proceedings is “strictly limited to that provided for by statute.” (stating that “statutes have superseded the common law in most aspects of family law”); -58 (Minn.1981) (stating that “dissolution is a statutory action and the authority of the trial court is limited to that provided for by statute”) (citation omitted).
Redburn v. Ferlitto 565 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Redburn v. Ferlitto 565 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Loo v. Loo 520 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1994
Loo v. Loo 520 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1994
Dissolution is a statutory action
Marriage of Darcy v. Darcy 455 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Darcy v. Darcy 455 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-58 (Minn.1981) (citations omitted).
In Re Marriage of McNattin v. McNattin 450 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re Marriage of McNattin v. McNattin 450 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
The trial court has the power to grant equitable relief “as the facts in each particular case and the ends of justice may require.” (quoting Johnston v. Johnston, 280 Minn. 81, 86 , ).
Marriage of Jensen v. Jensen 440 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Jensen v. Jensen 440 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
ANALYSIS Generally, the district courts are guided by equitable principles in determining the rights and liabilities of the parties upon a dissolution of the marriage relationship, * * * [and] the district court therefore has inherent power to grant equitable relief “as the facts in each particular case and the ends of justice may require.” (quoting Johnston v. Johnston, 280 Minn. 81, 86 , ).
Marriage of Lyon v. Lyon 439 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Lyon v. Lyon 439 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1989
This case is not like, say
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 435 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Diedrich v. Diedrich 424 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Diedrich v. Diedrich 424 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Rosenberg v. Townsend, Rosenberg & Young, Inc., (trial court has equitable powers in a dissolution proceeding to grant equitable relief required by the ends of justice); pet.
Marriage of Sandberg v. Johnston 415 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Sandberg v. Johnston 415 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(in dissolution proceedings courts are guided by equitable principles in determining parties’ rights and liabilities).
Marriage of Davey v. Davey 415 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Distinguished Marriage of Davey v. Davey 415 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
by awarding an equitable recovery of financial support provided to respondent during medical training.
Marriage of Sward v. Sward 410 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Sward v. Sward 410 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(court had authority to order restitution for one spouse’s contributions to the other’s professional education).
Redding v. Oldewartel 411 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Redding v. Oldewartel 411 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-58 (Minn.1981); courts have inherent power to grant equitable relief in dissolution actions); (trial court can grant relief in dissolution cases that is required to justly deal with interests of th
Marriage of Nelson v. Nelson 400 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Beede v. Law 400 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Beede v. Law 400 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 1987