Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Arbitration Between Ramsey County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Emp…, 309 N.W.2d 785.

56 citing documents.

Minnesota Nurses Association v. McLeod County, Relator, Public Employment Relations Board, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Minnesota Nurses Association v. McLeod County, Relator, Public Employment Relations Board, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8, n.3 (Minn. 1981) (“Past practice has been defined as a prior course of conduct which is consistently made in response to a recurring situation and regarded as a correct and required response under the circumstances.”) (emphasis added) (quotation marks omitted).
Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., Minn. 2023
Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
8 , (quotation omitted).
Itasca County, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Emps., Council 91, Local 8, (“Neither the correctness of the arbitrator’s conclusion nor the propriety of [the arbitrator’s] reasoning is relevant to a reviewing court, so long as [the] award complies with the .
Judy E. Adams, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Council 91, Local 8 , d 785, 793 (Minn. 1981).
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining Mao 854 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 2014
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. Sherburne County 695 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. Sherburne County 695 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
But Minnesota courts have recognized that under the past-practices doctrine, “the industrial law- — the practices of the industry and the shop — is equally a part of the collective bargaining agreement although not expressed in it.” Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8, (quoting United, Steelworkers of Am.v.
Menahga Education Ass'n v. Menahga Independent School District No. 821 568 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Menahga Education Ass'n v. Menahga Independent School District No. 821 568 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Employees, Council 91, Local 8, (citations omitted).
In Re the Arbitration Between the City of Saint Paul v. AFSCME Council 14, Local 2508 567 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Arbitration Between the City of Saint Paul v. AFSCME Council 14, Local 2508 567 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8
City of Minneapolis v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis 566 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
City of Minneapolis v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis 566 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8, (holding that once arbitrability is established, the only question before a reviewing court is whether the arbitrator’s decision meets the “essence” test or if it merely manifests the arbitrator’s personal notion of justice).
County of Hennepin v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local 19 527 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1995
County of Hennepin v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local 19 527 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1995
Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Local 8, -90 (Minn.1981).
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, District Council No. 14, Local Union No. 551 v. Minneapolis … 520 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, District Council No. 14, Local Union No. 551 v. Minneapolis … 520 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(quoting Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8, ).
State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Professional Employees 504 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1993
State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Professional Employees 504 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1993
See Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8
Morrison v. Northern States Power Co. 491 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mandich v. North Star Partnership 450 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Mandich v. North Star Partnership 450 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8
Arbitration Between Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Metropolitan Airports Police Federation 443 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1989
Arbitration Between Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Metropolitan Airports Police Federation 443 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1989
Where the decision is being challenged on the merits, an award cannot be vacated if it draws its “essence” from the contract and can “in some rational manner be derived from the agreement.” Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8
Arbitration Demand of 200 Levee Drive Associates, Ltd. v. Bor-Son Building Corp. 441 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Arbitration Demand of 200 Levee Drive Associates, Ltd. v. Bor-Son Building Corp. 441 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Ramsey County v. AFSCME Council 91, Beebout v. St.
Littfin Lumber Co. v. Fasching 436 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Littfin Lumber Co. v. Fasching 436 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Ramsey County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 91, Local 8, (quoting Amoco Oil Co. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 7-1 Inc., 548 F.2d 1288 (7th Cir.1977), cert.
Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating Trust 434 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating Trust 434 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Ramsey County v. AFSCME Council 91, Beebout v. St.
Knut. Co. v. Knutson Construction Co. 433 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Knut. Co. v. Knutson Construction Co. 433 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Beebout v. St.
Independent School District No. 51 v. School Service Employees Union Local 284 428 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Independent School District No. 51 v. School Service Employees Union Local 284 428 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
However, in Ramsey County v. AFSCME Council 91, Local 8, the supreme court stated that while the arbitrator’s power is not without limit, if the award draws its “essence” from the collective bargaining agreement, it is legitimate.
Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 426 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1988
Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 426 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1988
The trial court in its memorandum acknowledged the usual deference afforded *872 to Minnesota’s strong policy favoring arbitration, epitomized by language appearing in such of our cases as Ramsey County v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 91, Local 8, and in Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of University of Minn., 266 Minn. 284, 288
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. City of Roseville 393 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. City of Roseville 393 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“[W]ith respect to the issue of the merits of the dispute it is well settled that an arbitrator * * * is the final judge of both law and fact * * see Ramsey County v. AFSCME Council 91, Local 8
Beebout v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Beebout v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ramsey County v. AFSCME Council 91
Arbitration Proceedings Between Duluth Police Union v. City of Duluth 360 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Arbitration Proceedings Between Duluth Police Union v. City of Duluth 360 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ramsey County v. AFSCME Council 91
AFSCME Council 65, Local Union No. 667, Aitkin County Courthouse Employees v. Aitkin County 357 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
AFSCME Council 65, Local Union No. 667, Aitkin County Courthouse Employees v. Aitkin County 357 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8
In Re Arbitration County of Cass & Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 353 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re Arbitration County of Cass & Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 353 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(citations omitted) Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8, -90 (Minn.1981).
Afscme Dist. Coun. 96 v. Ind. Sch. Dist. 381 351 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In re Arbitration between AFSCME District Council 96 & Independent School District No. 381, Two Harbors 351 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by