Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Piletich v. Deretich, 328 N.W.2d 696.

26 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Michael Robert Jacobson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Interest of the State in Providing a Forum A state has “strong interests in assuring the marketability of property within its borders and in providing a procedure for peaceful resolution of disputes about the possession of that property.” Shaffer, 433 U.S. at 208; see also Piletich v. Deretich
Friends to Restore St. Mary's, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In Piletich v. Deretich , our supreme court observed that states have an “‘obvious and legitimate interest in the peaceful resolution of property disputes , and in providing a civil forum where the ownership of church property can be determined conclusively.’” (quoting Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595, 602, 99 S. Ct. 3020, 3024 (1979)).
Presbytery of the Twin Cities Area, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Following Jones, the Minnesota Supreme Court adopted the neutral-principles approach in Piletich v. Deretich, reiterating the Supreme Court’s observation th at a state has an “obvious and legitimate interest in the peaceful resolution of property disputes, and in providing a civil forum where the ownership of church property can be determined conclusively.” (quoting Jones, 443 U.S. at 602, 99 S. Ct. at 3025).
United Islamic Society v. Masjed Abubakr Al-Seddiq, Inc., and In the Matter of the: Putative Charitable Trust for … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
United Islamic Society v. Masjed Abubakr Al-Seddiq, Inc., and In the Matter of the: Putative Charitable Trust for … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Neutral Principles of Law The state has “‘an obvious and legitimate interest in the peaceful resolution of property disputes, and in providing a civil forum where the ownership of church property can be determined conclusively.’” 10 (quoting Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595, 602, 99 S. Ct. 3020, 3024 (1979)).
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
3020 ; Odenthal, d at 435 ; Hill-Murray Fed’n -64 (Minn.1992); -01 (Minn.1982).
Doe v. F.P., Diocese of Winona 667 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Doe v. F.P., Diocese of Winona 667 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
3020, 3025-26 , 61 L.Ed.2d 775 (1979), for the holding that there is no entanglement problem when a for the adoption of the neutral principles test in Minnesota).
Olson v. First Church of Nazarene 661 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Olson v. First Church of Nazarene 661 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
2372, 2385-6 , 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976); (holding that a matter of property ownership can be constitutionally examined by court applying neutral principles of law to terms of church documents).
J.M. v. Minnesota District Council of the Assemblies of God 658 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
J.M. v. Minnesota District Council of the Assemblies of God 658 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(holding that a matter of property ownership can be constitutionally examined by court applying neutral principles of law to terms of church documents).
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 649 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2002
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 649 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2002
a case concerning church membership and control of church property arising out of the same schism in the Serbian Eastern Orthodox Church that gave rise to Milivojevich .
Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of Hastings 626 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of Hastings 626 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
3020, 3024-3026 , 61 L.Ed.2d 775 (1979)
Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church 541 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church 541 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
3020, 3025-26 , 61 L.Ed.2d 775 (1979) (applying neutral principles of law analysis to church property dispute); (adopting neutral principles of law analysis for “resolution of church property and membership disputes”).
State v. Zimmer 487 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1992
State v. Zimmer 478 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Zimmer 478 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(adopting the neutral principles of law approach).
Patterson v. Bethel Baptist Church 389 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Patterson v. Bethel Baptist Church 389 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
holds that courts may avoid entanglement problems by applying principles of law in a purely sec *733 ular manner, taking care not to decide disputes on the basis of doctrinal matters, and deferring to decisions of church hierarchy only when church rules or constitutions or state statutes specifically requi
Hollenkamp v. Peters 358 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hollenkamp v. Peters 358 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1984