Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite White Bear Lake Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare, 319 N.W.2d 7.

66 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Minnesota Racing Commission’s Approval of Running Aces Casino, Hotel & Racetrack’s Request to … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of the Petition of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community for a Declaration that the … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Builders Association of the Twin Cities, d/b/a Housing First Minnesota, Petitioner, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Welfare, -9 (Minn. 1982).
Minn. 2021
In the Matter of the Petition of Valet Living for a Declaration that Interpretation Titled Corridor Trash Collection … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A18-2095 A18-2159 A18-2163 Minn. 2021
In the Matter of the Nursing Rate Appeal by Stewartville Care Center. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Welfare, and In re Contested Case of Ebenezer Soc’y v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs.
In the Matter of Minnesota Living Assistance, Inc., d/b/a Baywood Home Care. Minn. 2019
Welfare, (“Rules must be adopted in accordance with specific notice and comment procedures established by statute, and the failure to comply with necessary procedures results in invalidity of the rule.” (citation omitted)); –42 (Minn. 1980)
In the Matter of the Appeal by Woodson Institute for Excellence Charter School. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Gist v. Atlas Staffing, Inc. 910 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2018
Gist v. Atlas Staffing, Inc. 910 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2018
Welfare , , 8 (Minn. 1982).
A17-1096 Minn. 2018
Builders Association of the Twin Cities v. Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry 872 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Builders Association of the Twin Cities v. Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry 872 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Welfare, (citation omitted).
Minnesota Environmental Science and Economic Review Board v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 870 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota Environmental Science and Economic Review Board v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 870 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Welfare, -9 (Minn. 1982).
United States Steel Corporation, Relator v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2015
United States Steel Corporation, Relator v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Welfare, ), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Welfare, see Minn. Stat. § 14.45 (2012) (stating that this court must declare a rule invalid if it was adopted “without compliance with statutory rulemaking procedures”).
In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees 820 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees 820 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Welfare, -9 (Minn.1982); In re Contested Case of Ebenezer Soc’y v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs.
Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 765 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 765 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Welfare, (citation omitted).
Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of Commissioners 713 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2006
Card v. KANDIYOHI CTY. BD. OF COM'RS 713 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2006
Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of Commissioners 713 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2006
White Bear Lake Care Center
Card v. KANDIYOHI CTY. BD. OF COM'RS 713 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2006
White Bear Lake Care Center
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Elim Homes, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 575 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Elim Homes, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 575 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services 529 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services 529 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-9 (Minn.1982) (agency practice of computing cost changes on per diem basis); (agency reclassification of food categories); (unofficial moratorium on harbor development).
Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 469 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 469 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Surf and Sand, Inc. v. Gardebring 457 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Surf and Sand, Inc. v. Gardebring 457 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
On May 14,1982, which stated: [DHS’] use of a per diem method of calculating implementation of known cost changes pursuant to [Rule 49] is improper because the method constitutes an un-promulgated rule.
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(citing White Bear Lake Care Center, ).
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
Welfare, -9 (Minn.1982).
Contested Case of Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 433 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 433 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See White Bear Lake Care Center, (“the failure to comply with the necessary procedures results in invalidity of the rule”); -43 (Minn.1980).
Contested Case of Surf & Sand Nursing Home v. Department of Human Services 422 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Surf & Sand Nursing Home v. Department of Human Services 422 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
At the hearing, the only unresolved rate issue was the proper method of calculating “known cost change paybacks.” The administrative law judge concluded that White Bear Lake Care Center, should be applied retroactively and that the gross dollar method of calculating the payback should be used.
In Re the Solid Waste Permit for the NSP Red Wing Ash Disposal Facility 421 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Solid Waste Permit for the NSP Red Wing Ash Disposal Facility 421 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See White Bear Lake Care Center, (failure to comply with necessary procedures results in invalidity of a rule).
Contested Case of Christian Nursing Center v. Department of Human Services 419 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Christian Nursing Center v. Department of Human Services 419 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See White Bear Lake Care Center, Inc., v. Minnesota Dep’t of Public Welfare, (recognizing the prior department rule ("Rule 49”) as an authorized and properly promulgated legislative rule); (regulation adopted pursuant to statutory authority was legislative rule where the statute granted the Commissioner of Transporta

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by