DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Champion, 319 N.W.2d 21.

224 citing documents.

  • Shelley v. State 412 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Shelley v. State 412 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • White v. State 400 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • White v. State 400 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Christensen v. State 399 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Christensen v. State 399 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Riley v. State 396 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Bettin v. State 396 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Bettin v. State 396 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Riley v. State 396 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Effinger v. State 380 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1986
  • Effinger v. State 380 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1986
  • Smith v. State 371 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Smith v. State 371 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Effinger v. State 368 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Effinger v. State 368 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Dickens 356 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Dickens 356 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Gilles v. State 349 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1984
  • Gilles v. State 349 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1984
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that his prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal co
  • Wooldridge v. State 342 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1984
  • Wooldridge v. State 342 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1984
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Sherer v. State 335 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1983
  • Hegna v. State 335 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1983
  • Sherer v. State 335 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Hegna v. State 335 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Muhammed v. State 333 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Quast 333 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Quast 333 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Muhammed v. State 333 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Laquier v. State 333 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1983
  • Laquier v. State 333 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Gant v. State 332 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Byndum 332 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1983
  • Fulton v. State 332 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1983
  • Fulton v. State 332 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Gant v. State 332 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • State v. Byndum 332 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in eases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Johnson v. State 331 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1983
  • Owens v. State 331 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1983
  • Owens v. State 331 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Johnson v. State 331 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal co
  • Williams v. State 330 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1983
  • Williams v. State 330 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Ahearn v. State 329 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1983
  • Ahearn v. State 329 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Gross v. State 329 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1983
  • Gross v. State 329 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Piringer v. State 328 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1983
  • Standslast v. State 328 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1983