DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Champion, 319 N.W.2d 21.

224 citing documents.

  • Bruestle v. State 321 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1982
  • Palm v. State 321 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1982
  • Cummings v. State 321 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Hyatt 321 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1982
  • Biskey v. State 321 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1982
  • Palm v. State 321 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1982
  • Ridsdale v. State 321 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1982
    “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after his
  • Burns v. State 321 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1982
    “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after his
  • Bruestle v. State 321 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1982
  • Hittle v. State 321 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1982
  • Powless v. State 320 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Larsen 320 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1982
  • Stofferahn v. State 320 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Klang 320 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Klang 320 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1982
  • Powless v. State 320 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Larsen 320 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1982
    “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after his re
  • Stofferahn v. State 320 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Willis 320 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Gorham 320 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Willis 320 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Gorham 320 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Boman 320 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Boman 320 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1982
    As we stated in State v. Champion, *79 “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding which is prerequisite to resentencingj at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con