DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Champion, 319 N.W.2d 21.

224 citing documents.

  • State v. Clemens 328 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1983
  • Mogren v. State 328 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1983
  • Thomason v. State 328 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1983
  • Standslast v. State 328 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Thomason v. State 328 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Piringer v. State 328 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal co
  • Mogren v. State 328 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1983
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • State v. Clemens 328 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1983
    *440 we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • State v. Dahms 328 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Dahms 328 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Richardson v. State 327 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
  • Troyer v. State 327 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1982
  • Sabo v. State 327 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1982
  • Knight v. State 327 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1982
  • Bonin v. State 327 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1982
  • Richardson v. State 327 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Knight v. State 327 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Sabo v. State 327 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Troyer v. State 327 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1982
    we indicated that a petitioner’s record as a violent offender and his record *83 of recidivism are relevant factors to be considered in determining whether or not to resentence him according to the Sentencing Guidelines.
  • Bonin v. State 327 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Frank v. State 326 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1982
  • Frank v. State 326 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal co
  • Quast v. State 326 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1982
  • Jackson v. State 326 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Harding 325 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 1982
  • DeFoe v. State 326 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1982
  • Schultz v. State 326 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1982
  • Boyd v. State 326 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1982
  • Slaughter v. State 326 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1982
  • Rieck v. State 326 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1982
  • Morse v. State 326 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 1982
  • Zich v. State 326 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1982
  • Thiele v. State 326 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
  • Rieck v. State 326 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1982
  • Zich v. State 326 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1982
  • Schultz v. State 326 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1982
  • Quast v. State 326 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1982
  • Slaughter v. State 326 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1982
  • DeFoe v. State 326 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1982
  • Boyd v. State 326 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Jackson v. State 326 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal co
  • Morse v. State 326 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Harding 325 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal co
  • Thiele v. State 326 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal condu
  • Novak v. State 325 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1982
  • Novak v. State 325 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal co
  • Hanson v. State 325 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1982
  • Clipper v. State 325 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1982
  • Cobb v. State 325 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1982
  • Osborn v. State 325 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1982