DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Champion, 319 N.W.2d 21.

224 citing documents.

  • Laube v. State 322 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Garcia v. State 322 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Evans v. State 322 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Hopkins 322 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 1982
  • Holscher v. State 322 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Hardy 322 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1982
  • Meaney v. State 322 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1982
  • Jones v. State 322 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Anderson 322 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1982
  • Wright v. State 322 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1982
  • Kvale v. State 322 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1982
  • Jones v. State 322 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal c
  • Wright v. State 322 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1982
    “[W]e generally will not interfere with the post-conviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after h
  • State v. Hardy 322 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1982
    “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after hi
  • Holscher v. State 322 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1982
    “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after hi
  • Kvale v. State 322 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1982
    “[W]e generally will not interfere with the post-conviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after h
  • Meaney v. State 322 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1982
    “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in *342 cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct aft
  • Evans v. State 322 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1982
    “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after hi
  • State v. Anderson 322 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1982
    “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after hi
  • State v. Hopkins 322 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 1982
    “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after hi
  • Misner v. State 322 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1982
  • Beaupre v. State 322 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1982
  • Beaupre v. State 322 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resen-tencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal
  • Misner v. State 322 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1982
    that “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct af
  • Vann v. State 322 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1982
  • Peterson v. State 322 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1982
  • Vann v. State 322 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1982
    “[We] generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after hi
  • Peterson v. State 322 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1982
  • State v. King 322 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1982
  • Hamling v. State 322 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1982
  • Jones v. State 322 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1982
  • Rupert v. State 322 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 1982
  • Rupert v. State 322 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 1982
  • Hamling v. State 322 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1982
  • State v. King 322 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1982
  • Jones v. State 322 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Cain 322 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Cain 322 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Nelson 321 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Olson 321 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Kunshier 321 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Nelson 321 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Kunshier 321 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Olson 321 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Hyatt 321 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1982
  • Biskey v. State 321 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1982
  • Hittle v. State 321 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1982
  • Ridsdale v. State 321 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1982
  • Burns v. State 321 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1982
  • Cummings v. State 321 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1982