Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Haley v. Forcelle, 669 N.W.2d 48.

36 citing documents.

Pioneer Bank v. Might Enterprises, Inc., et al., The 209 Group, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appellants argue that the district court abused its discretion in granting the injunction because Pioneer Bank’s asserted harm is “speculative, non-imminent, and purely economic.” Purely Economic Generally, irreparable injury “must be of such a nature that money damages alone would not provide adequate relief.” rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Continua Interiors of Minnesota, LLC v. Brandon Hess, et al. (A25-1472), Continua Interiors of Minnesota, LLC, vs. Mark … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Generally, the injury must be of such a nature that money damages alone would not provide adequate relief.” rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Minnesota Duty Disabled Association (MNDDA), a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. State of Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding that discharged employees failed to allege irreparable harm because reinstatement and backpay would be available if they prevailed on the merits); Morse, d at 730 (same); (“We agree .
Susan Schneider v. Max Schmidt, et al., KMAX Paradise Pork, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“The relationship between shareholders of a closely held corporation is analogous to the relationship between partners in a partnership.”) , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Douglas J. Malark, Malark Family Trust v. Sheryl F. Malark Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Teamsters Local 320 v. Minnesota Judicial Branch Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, by Jan Malcolm, Commissioner of Health in her official capacity v. The Iron Waffle Coffee … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” 8 rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Pilot Air Freight, LLC v. Adam Trenberth, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
County of Wright v. Robin Ann Schiel, Korie Allan Schiel Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unle ss clearly erroneous.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Nick Kossick v. DiamondRock Development L.L.C., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Nancy Leppink, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, et al v. Water Gremlin Company Minn. Ct. App. 2020
2 “A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Shari Monica Kristo v. David R. Johnson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Its purpose is to preserve the status quo until adjudication of the case on its merits.” (quotations and citation omitted) , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Daniel Call v. Ralph Call, Winco, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
EMERGE Community Development v. Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Damian Loth v. Gregory Hoscheit, et al., George Griffith Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Shareholders in a closely held corpora tion typically have an expectation of continuing employment, and the discharge of a shareholder-employee may be grounds for equitable relief under Minn. Stat. § 302A.751.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Fern Hill Place Retail Association, Inc. v. Fern Hill Place Homeowners Association, Inc., Cities Management, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Its purpose is to preserve the status quo until adjudication of the case on its merits.” 55 (Minn. App. 2003) (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, et al v. City of Minneapolis Minn. Ct. App. 2017
No. 35 v. Engelstad, 274 Minn. 366, 370, (same), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Edna Ruth Albertson, et al v. Timberjay, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“But, in close corporations, the e xpectations of sharehol ders are not always encompassed in written agreements and written agreements are not always dispositive of shareholder expectations.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Kristina Greene, et al v. Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The grant of a temporary injunction does not establish the law of the case or constitute an adjudication on the m erits.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
The Valspar Corporation v. Douglas T. Mueller, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Aase Law Firm, PLLC v. Aria Law Firm, P.A., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Aase Law Firm, PLLC v. Aria Law Firm, P.A., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Carl Bolander & review denied (Minn. Nov.
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDaniels, et al 865 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDaniels, et al 865 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous,” review denied (Minn. Nov.
A14-1525 Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A14-1525 Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
14 “A temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy,” and “[i]ts purpose is to preserve the status quo until adjudication of the case on its merits.” (quotations omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera Marshall 836 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera Marshall 836 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co. 802 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co. 802 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Softchoice, Inc. v. Schmidt 763 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Softchoice, Inc. v. Schmidt 763 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunc-tive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Cross Country Bank, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Cross Country Bank, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set *572 aside unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schwan 687 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schwan 687 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Only a trial on the merits has such effect.”); review denied (Minn. Nov.