Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Haley v. Forcelle, 669 N.W.2d 48.

35 citing documents.

A25-1473 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Generally, the injury must be of such a nature that money damages alone would not provide adequate relief.” rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Minnesota Duty Disabled Association (MNDDA), a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding that discharged employees failed to allege irreparable harm because reinstatement and backpay would be available if they prevailed on the merits); Morse, d at 730 (same); (“We agree .
Susan Schneider, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“The relationship between shareholders of a closely held corporation is analogous to the relationship between partners in a partnership.”) , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Douglas J. Malark, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Teamsters Local 320, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, by Jan Malcolm, Commissioner of Health in her official capacity, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” 8 rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Pilot Air Freight, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
County of Wright, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unle ss clearly erroneous.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Nick Kossick, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Nancy Leppink, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
2 “A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Shari Monica Kristo, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Its purpose is to preserve the status quo until adjudication of the case on its merits.” (quotations and citation omitted) , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Daniel Call, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
EMERGE Community Development, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Damian Loth, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Shareholders in a closely held corpora tion typically have an expectation of continuing employment, and the discharge of a shareholder-employee may be grounds for equitable relief under Minn. Stat. § 302A.751.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Fern Hill Place Retail Association, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Its purpose is to preserve the status quo until adjudication of the case on its merits.” 55 (Minn. App. 2003) (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
No. 35 v. Engelstad, 274 Minn. 366, 370, (same), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Edna Ruth Albertson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“But, in close corporations, the e xpectations of sharehol ders are not always encompassed in written agreements and written agreements are not always dispositive of shareholder expectations.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Kristina Greene, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The grant of a temporary injunction does not establish the law of the case or constitute an adjudication on the m erits.” Haley v. Forcelle , review denied (Minn. Nov.
The Valspar Corporation, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Aase Law Firm, PLLC v. Aria Law Firm, P.A. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Aase Law Firm, PLLC v. Aria Law Firm, P.A. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Carl Bolander & review denied (Minn. Nov.
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDaniels 865 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDaniels 865 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous,” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
14 “A temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy,” and “[i]ts purpose is to preserve the status quo until adjudication of the case on its merits.” (quotations omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera Marshall 836 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera Marshall 836 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co. 802 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co. 802 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Softchoice, Inc. v. Schmidt 763 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Softchoice, Inc. v. Schmidt 763 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunc-tive relief will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Cross Country Bank, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Cross Country Bank, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“A district court’s findings regarding entitlement to injunctive relief will not be set *572 aside unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schwan 687 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schwan 687 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Only a trial on the merits has such effect.”); review denied (Minn. Nov.