Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., 689 N.W.2d 779.

56 citing documents.

Doe A.S. v. St. John the Evangelist Episcopal, St. Paul, Episcopal Church in Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
However, the nonmoving party “may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., see also Minn. R. Civ.
Julie Massaquoi, et al v. Abe Al-Qudeh Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Julie Massaquoi, et al v. Abe Al-Qudeh Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The nonmoving party “may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., d 779, 783 (Minn. 2004).
Charlie Thoemke v. Christopher Roland Lamke Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The party opposing summary judgment may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Roger Sand v. Sand Pine Pheasants Family Recreation, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Roger Sand v. Sand Pine Pheasants Family Recreation, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In analogously considering a contractual right of first refusal in the context of an agricultural lease, the Minnesota Supreme Court explained that it has “long recognized the right of parties to freely contract, and will enforce legal rights according to contract terms.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
A Business Solutions Company LLC, d/b/a AFOX Solutions, LLC, a LGBTE Company, et al v. American Business Forms, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
9 Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., (“The party opposing summary judgment may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.”).
Suzanne Stephens v. Jon Goodwin as Trustee of the Cleone J. Goodwin Revocable Trust Agreement dated July 17, … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Although Minnesota has no caselaw directly addressing options in a trust without a deadline, in other contexts, Minnesota courts have held that if a “contract provides no deadline for accepting or rejecting the offer of sale, acceptance must be within a reasonable time.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., (emphasis added); see also 80 Am.
Jonathan G. Foss v. Mark Scott Savage, Susan Foss, et al., Third Party Defendants Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., (holding a party does not “establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations”).
Matthew Braith, et al v. Laurie Ann Duban, et al., Aaron Todd Kasparek, and Nicole Lynn Campbell f/k/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
John P. Norusis v. John Goodfellow, et al., Peter Reich, et al., Andrew Kramer, et al., Larry Whitaker … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
However, the nonmoving party “may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Darwin Boutain, et al v. Aaron Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., -90 (Minn. App. 2003) (citing cases in which sanctions awards were reversed for failure to follow rule-11 procedures), aff’d
Cole Clark v. Brian Goihl, et al., vs. Andrew Arens Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Capacity Wireless, LLC v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Still, the party opposing summary judgment “may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
BDS Laundry Management Company, vs Haven, LLC, et al., ABC Corporation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minnesota courts “have long recognized th e right of parties to freely contract, and will enforce legal rights according to contract terms.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Dr. Kimberly Finch v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A genuine issue of material fact does not arise from “unverified and conclusory allegations” or “metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Inland Edinburgh Festival, LLC, Minn. 2020
§ 1031 “allows for the equity received from a sale of investment property to be reinvested into ‘like kind’ property of equal or greater value without payment of capital gains tax.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc ., n.2 (Minn. 2004).
Robert F. Goerdt, et al v. Lucille Goerdt, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The lack of a time period during which Robert and Lucille must agree on a purchase price does not render the option unenforceable, as Minnesota law provides that when no deadline is provided to perform under an option, performance must be done within a “reasonable time.” See Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., (“We acknowledge that upon receiving notice, a lessee may have to clarify or investigate uncertainties and ambiguities of essential terms, but we also conclude that such an inquiry must be don
Thondee Pongmalee, et al., Jeffrey K. Priest, et al v. Wat Lao Sirithammaraam Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Dyrdal v. Gold en Nuggets, Inc. , (rejecting substantial-co mpliance argument), aff’d on other grounds
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc. 925 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 2019
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc. 925 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 2019
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc. , , 783 (Minn. 2004).
In re Poole 921 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re Poole 921 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
P. 60.02 ); Rossberg v. State , , 791 (Minn. 2016) (postconviction relief); Andersen v. State , , 12 (Minn. 2013) (obtaining an evidentiary hearing in criminal matters after waiving the right to testify); Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., , 783 (Minn. 2004) (summary judgment); In re Rahr Malting Co. , , 576 (Minn. 2001) (whether something is a trade secret); In re Welfare of L.L.P.
Morgan-Walg, LLC v. Nicollet Island Development Co., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
010 and July 8, 2011, Morgan-Walg was paid $5,010,000 and that he “d[id] not se e how those payments were accounted for in Morgan-Walg’s motion for summary judgment.” A party cannot defeat summary judgment “by relying upon unverified and c onclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
J.C. Allen Co., Inc. v. Wisconsin Central Ltd., an Illinois company Minn. Ct. App. 2018
conclusory allegations.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
AgCountry Farm Credit Services, ACA v. Richard Steven Elbert Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The party opposing summa ry judgment “may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Scott J. Zimmer, et al v. Brett M. Larson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
U. S. Bank National Association, successor by merger to U. S. Bank National Association ND v. Anita Brochette … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., (stating that party opposing summary judgment must do more than rely on “unverified and conclusory allegations”).
A17-0297 A17-0059 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., aff ’d
City Center Commons, LLC v. DeSoto Associates, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The party opposing summary judgment may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Ann Majerus v. Harvey L. Huyser, Barbara St. John, Tony Montgomery Realty and Auction Company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ann Majerus v. Harvey L. Huyser, Barbara St. John, Tony Montgomery Realty and Auction Company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The party opposing summary judgment may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Robert L. Follis, Georgia K. Follis v. State Armory Building Commission Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robert L. Follis, Georgia K. Follis v. State Armory Building Commission Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A. Genuine Issue of Material Fact “The party opposing summary judgment may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated 5 evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Wajiha Shirin Shah v. IMI’s MN, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Wajiha Shirin Shah v. IMI’s MN, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Drydal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., d 779, 785 n.4 (Minn. 2004) (describing anticipatory breach).
Gail R. Trotta v. Duluth Realty Company, Randy Underthun, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gail R. Trotta v. Duluth Realty Company, Randy Underthun, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Johnson, d at 518; see also Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., (stating that even “substantial compliance” with the procedural requirements of section 549.211 and rule 11 is insufficient), aff’d on other grounds
White v. Many Rivers West Ltd. Partnership 797 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
White v. Many Rivers West Ltd. Partnership 797 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., aff'd
NC Properties, LLC v. Lind 797 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
NC Properties, LLC v. Lind 797 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
But the nonmoving party “may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed later at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Hempel v. Creek House Trust 743 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Hempel v. Creek House Trust 743 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See, e.g., Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., (holding that a right of first refusal “ripens into an option when the owner receives a bona fide third party offer and notifies the holder of the right”); Park-Lake Car Wash, (distinguishing a right-first-refusal agreement from an option contract beca
Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Liabo v. Wayzata Nissan, LLC 707 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Liabo v. Wayzata Nissan, LLC 707 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
“The party opposing summary judgment may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
Dunham v. Roer 708 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Dunham v. Roer 708 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
“The party opposing summary judgment may not establish genuine issues of material fact by relying upon unverified and conclusory allegations, or postulated evidence that might be developed at trial, or metaphysical doubt about the facts.” Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.