Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan Council, 685 N.W.2d 1.

37 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ritalka, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Charles Wayne Weyhrauch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joseph Harvey Bellanger. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Council, (“The preponderance of the evidence standard requires that to establish a fact, it must be more probable that the fact exists than that the contrary exists.”).
Charles Matthew Waters, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Council, (citing City of Lake Elmo in an OFP appeal).
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Death Benefit for Jerome Richard Lannon (deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Council, (explaining that to meet the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard, “it must be more probable that the fact exists than that the contrary exists”).
In the Matter of: Mara Jareth Butler, and on behalf of minors, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Minn. 2022
In the Appeal of Jared Cunningham re: DHS Appeal for Maltreatment of a Minor. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Council, (“The preponderance of the evidence standard requires that to establish a fact, it must be more probable that the fact exists than that the contrary exists.”).
Antonio Deandre Johnson, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kevin David Jante, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Appeal by Amy Seelye of the Maltreatment Determination and the Amended Order of … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan Council
A18-1870 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
Council , , 4 (Minn. 2004).
In the Matter of: Joanne Lynn Kargel Lund, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Lisa Marie Hessel, individually and o/b/o minor children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Council, (defining “preponderance of the evidence” as enough evidence to make it “more probable that the fact exists than that the contrary exists”).
In the Matter of: Jessica Jo O’Leary, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Cindy Jean Oberg obo minor child v. Gregory Brian Bradley 868 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Cindy Jean Oberg obo minor child v. Gregory Brian Bradley 868 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Matt Anthony Haeg v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Matt Anthony Haeg v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ricky Lee McDeid v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ricky Lee McDeid v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Greer Elizabeth Dempster Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Greer Elizabeth Dempster Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Council, (“The preponderance of the evidence standard requires that to establish a fact, it must be more probable that the fact exists than that the contrary exists.”).
State of Minnesota v. Stacy Jean Fouquette Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Stacy Jean Fouquette Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Council, (“The preponderance of the evidence standard requires that to establish a fact, it must be more probable that the fact exists than that the contrary exists.”).
Jack Eugene Christiansen v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jack Eugene Christiansen v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Council, (“The preponderance of the evidence standard requires that to establish a fact, it must be more probable that the fact exists than that the contrary exists.”).
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
Council, -6 (Minn.2004) (explaining that the Metropolitan Council reviews local comprehensive plans and has broad authority to require modification of plans that are inconsistent with the council’s overarching plan).
Concept Properties, LLP v. City of Minnetrista 694 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Concept Properties, LLP v. City of Minnetrista 694 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Council, (discussing purpose of Metropolitan Council as coordinator of long-term land-use development to prevent urban sprawl).