Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 679 N.W.2d 378.

45 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of: M. I. S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(stating that corroborative evidence of sexual assault includes a “prompt complaint by a victim” and “[t]estimony from others about a victim’s emotional condition after a sexual assault”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. William Wayne Weber Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. William Wayne Weber Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that a prompt complaint and evidence of a victim’s emotional condition are corroborative), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: M. S. M., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A prompt complaint by a victim is corroborative evidence of a rape,” as is “[t]estimony from others about a victim’s emotional condition after a sexual assault.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Overruled State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Diaz accurately cites State v. Johnson for the proposition that we held that the district court erred by “instruct[ing] the jury that corroboration is not required,” reasoning that “the lack of corroboration is an evidentiary matter, rather than a substantive matter.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(citing Minn. Stat. § 609.347, subd.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[I]nconsistencies and related credibility determinations [are] for the jury to assess.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[I]nconsistencies and related credibility determinations [are] for the jury to assess.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(concluding that on review for sufficiency of the evidence “inconsistencies and related credibility determinations were for the jury to assess”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Lopez 897 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Lopez 897 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In State v. Johnson, the second case cited by the state, we determined that instructions to leave a bedroom within an apartment did not amount to withdrawal of consent to be in a “building” because the bedroom “was neither separately rented out nor a self-contained unit.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Filbert Okari Onyoni Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Filbert Okari Onyoni Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Minor inconsistencies and conflicts in evidence do not necessarily render testimony false or provide the basis for reversal.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fourth, “[a] prompt complaint by a victim is corroborative evidence of a rape.” d 378, 387 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Ryan James Sabot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ryan James Sabot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“[I]t is for the jury, not this court, to determine the credibility and weight to be given to the testimony of witnesses.”); (concluding that on review for sufficiency of the evidence “inconsistencies and related credibility determinations were for the jury to assess”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Ruben Alonso Avendano Contreras Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ruben Alonso Avendano Contreras Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Ernest Henry Chouinard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ernest Henry Chouinard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Minn. Stat. § 609.347 (2012); review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Gerard McNeal, and Gerard McNeal v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gerard McNeal, and Gerard McNeal v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
To support his lack-of-corroboration argument, review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Keith Dawson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Keith Dawson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Beane 840 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Beane 840 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-11 (Minn.App.1999) (treating apartment as building under the burglary statute), review denied (Minn. May 18, 1999); (bedroom within apartment not a “building” under burglary statute, but self-contained apartment is), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Lewis v. Commissioner of Public Safety 737 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Lewis v. Commissioner of Public Safety 737 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Johnson v. Fabian 735 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 2007
Johnson v. Fabian 735 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 2007
State v. Fields 730 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2007
State v. Fields 730 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2007
In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Johnson v. Fabian 711 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Johnson v. Fabian 711 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
review denied (Minn. Aug.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by