Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ramey, 721 N.W.2d 294.

1028 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. K., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ty-Yn Shakhaun Holley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ty-Yn Shakhaun Holley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it 4 “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” d 294, 302 (Minn. 2006).
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Vern Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ashimiyu Gbolahan Alowonle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ashimiyu Gbolahan Alowonle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Vern Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cory Cork Ryden Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Octavius Marcus Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Frank Lucellerson Tubbs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cory Cork Ryden Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(providing that an error is plain if it is clear or obvious or if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct”).
State of Minnesota v. Octavius Marcus Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Frank Lucellerson Tubbs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
n.6 (Minn. 2006) (“The court of appeals does not exercise supervisory powers that are reserved to [the Minnesota Supreme Court].”).
State of Minnesota v. Randall Ferrell Decker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Arteco Marvell Rhodes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Randall Ferrell Decker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Usually this is shown if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Arteco Marvell Rhodes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wilfred Carl Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cindarion De'Angelo Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jean Clarice Clement Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cindarion De'Angelo Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wilfred Carl Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jean Clarice Clement Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it is clear or obvious under current law, and an error is clear or obvious if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct,”
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Gorgol Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Gorgol Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To grant relief under plain-error review, “there must be (1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) affects substantial rights.”
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(applying the modified plain-error test to unobjected-to prosecutorial misconduct).
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Erick Robert Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Usually this is shown if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Erick Robert Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Paul Warzecha Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Paul Warzecha Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jiyaad Jamaal Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jiyaad Jamaal Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
23 (Minn. 2006) (stating that the burden shifts to the state to demonstrate that the misconduct did not affect substantial rights).
State of Minnesota v. Peter William Warren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Peter William Warren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amy Andrea Horsfield Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ernesto Veraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ernesto Veraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is clear or obvious if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Amy Andrea Horsfield Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See State v. Carridine, 812 ().
RKL Landholdings, LLC v. Seneca Specialty Insurance Company, 1563 University Ave, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
RKL Landholdings, LLC v. Seneca Specialty Insurance Company, 1563 University Ave, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ass’n, [hereinafter Poppler II] (), aff’d
State of Minnesota v. Julian Sanchez-Sanchez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Julian Sanchez-Sanchez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To grant relief, “there must be (1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) affects substantial rights.”
State of Minnesota v. Arthur Charles Huffman Minn. Ct. App. 2015