Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ramey, 721 N.W.2d 294.

1039 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Cory Allen Wuollet Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Alan Edsill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Alan Edsill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An error is plain if it was clear or obvious.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Cory Allen Wuollet Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Usually this is shown if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Duane Thomas Mizner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Duane Thomas Mizner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
N I. Mizner argues that “the prosecutor committed reversible plain error by eliciting testimony that [he] wanted to talk to an attorney when asked by police to give a second statement.” “Prosecutors have an affirmative obligation to ensure that a defendant receives a fair trial, no matter how strong the evidence of guilt.”
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is “plain” if it is clear or obvious under current law, (quotation omitted), and an error is clear or obvious if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct,”
State of Minnesota v. Leonard James Fisherman, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Leonard James Fisherman, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. K., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. K., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ty-Yn Shakhaun Holley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ty-Yn Shakhaun Holley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it 4 “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” d 294, 302 (Minn. 2006).
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Vern Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ashimiyu Gbolahan Alowonle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ashimiyu Gbolahan Alowonle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Vern Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cory Cork Ryden Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Octavius Marcus Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Frank Lucellerson Tubbs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Octavius Marcus Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Frank Lucellerson Tubbs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
n.6 (Minn. 2006) (“The court of appeals does not exercise supervisory powers that are reserved to [the Minnesota Supreme Court].”).
State of Minnesota v. Cory Cork Ryden Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(providing that an error is plain if it is clear or obvious or if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct”).
State of Minnesota v. Randall Ferrell Decker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Arteco Marvell Rhodes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Randall Ferrell Decker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Usually this is shown if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Arteco Marvell Rhodes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wilfred Carl Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cindarion De’Angelo Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jean Clarice Clement Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cindarion De’Angelo Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wilfred Carl Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jean Clarice Clement Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it is clear or obvious under current law, and an error is clear or obvious if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct,”
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Gorgol Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Gorgol Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To grant relief under plain-error review, “there must be (1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) affects substantial rights.”
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(applying the modified plain-error test to unobjected-to prosecutorial misconduct).
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Erick Robert Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Usually this is shown if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Erick Robert Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Paul Warzecha Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Paul Warzecha Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jiyaad Jamaal Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jiyaad Jamaal Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
23 (Minn. 2006) (stating that the burden shifts to the state to demonstrate that the misconduct did not affect substantial rights).