Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ramey, 721 N.W.2d 294.

1028 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Carlos Heard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Carlos Heard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Arthur Charles Huffman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Deante Akis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Deante Akis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“On appeal, an unobjected-to error can be reviewed only if it constitutes plain error affecting substantial rights.” (citing Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Artis Iverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Abdulkadir Ali Mohamud v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Abdulkadir Ali Mohamud v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Artis Iverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is “plain” if it is clear or obvious under current law, and an error is clear or obvious if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct,”
State of Minnesota v. David Muniz Bustos 861 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that plain-error review “requires a defendant to establish” its three conditions), (shifting the burden on the third condition in cases involving allegations of prosecutorial misconduct).
State of Minnesota v. Armando Jesus Pedraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Armando Jesus Pedraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(d 743, 748 (Minn. 1984), ).
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Ardell Gentry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Ardell Gentry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that the burden shifts to the state to demonstrate that the misconduct did not affect substantial rights).
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the context of unobjected-to prosecutorial misconduct, once error is shown, the burden is on the state to demonstrate that its plainly erroneous misconduct “did not prejudice the defendant’s substantial rights.” -300 (Minn. 2006).
State of Minnesota v. Saaundre Julian Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Saaundre Julian Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“On appeal, an unobjected-to error can be reviewed only if it constitutes plain error affecting substantial rights.”).
State of Minnesota v. Clarence Bruce Beaulieu 859 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Clarence Bruce Beaulieu 859 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2015
1038 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985)
State of Minnesota v. Marc Jonathan Knotz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Fonati McArthur Diggs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Thomas Labarre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Marc Jonathan Knotz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain when it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Fonati McArthur Diggs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Thomas Labarre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Robbin Alexander McNeil Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Robbin Alexander McNeil Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald James Helps Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricky James Bedell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Abe Joseph Boushee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricky James Bedell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Donald James Helps Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Abe Joseph Boushee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is “plain” if it is clear or obvious under current law, and an error is clear or obvious if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct,”
State of Minnesota v. Paris Treall Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paris Treall Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To grant relief, “there must be (1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) affects substantial rights.” State v. 10 Ramey
State of Minnesota v. Justin Christopher Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Justin Christopher Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Lukas Roy Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shelby Ivan Charles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shelby Ivan Charles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lukas Roy Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2014