Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pendleton, 706 N.W.2d 500.
- State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Lynch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna Flowers Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna Flowers
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the district court and will not be overturned absent a clear abuse of discretion, “even when constitutional rights are implicated.”
- State v. Juarez 837 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 2013
- State v. Juarez 837 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 2013
- State v. Munt 831 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2013
- State v. Munt 831 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2013
- State v. Olsen 824 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
State v. Olsen
824 N.W.2d 334
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
“Evidentiary rulings of the district court will not be overturned absent a clear abuse of discretion, even when constitutional rights are implicated.”
- State v. Hahn 799 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen 781 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 2010
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen 781 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 2010
- State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
State v. Bauer
776 N.W.2d 462
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(stating presumption that jury follows district court’s instructions); (holding no reversible error although prosecutor erred by impermissibly questioning a witness when district court sustained objection and properly instructed jury).
- State v. Jackson 773 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 2009
- State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
-
State v. Jackson
773 N.W.2d 111
Minn. 2009
(holding that prosecutorial misconduct may be cured by district court instruction); (same).
-
State v. Martin
773 N.W.2d 89
Minn. 2009
(holding that prosecu-torial misconduct may be cured by district court instruction); (same).
- State v. Spence 768 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 2009
- State v. Spence 768 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 2009
- State v. Jones 755 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- State v. Jones 755 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- State v. Brown 739 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2007
- State v. Brown 739 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2007
- State v. Brown 732 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 2007
- State v. Brown 732 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 2007
- State v. Scanlon 719 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Scanlon
719 N.W.2d 674
Minn. 2006
nsistent with a hypothesis of guilt, it is also equally consistent with alternative hypotheses.” When analyzing a claim of insufficient evidence, we undertake a “painstaking review of the record to determine whether the evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, were sufficient to allow the jury to reach its verdict.”
- State v. Mogler 719 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Mogler 719 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2006