Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pendleton, 706 N.W.2d 500.

130 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
When reviewing sufficiency -of-the-evidence claims, “it is for the jury, not [a reviewing] court, to determine the credibility and weight to be given to the 8 testimony of witnesses.” State v. Pendleton
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Fraga 898 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2017
State v. Fraga 898 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2017
(stating that the appellant has the burden to prove that the district court abused its discretion).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Corey James Fordham Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Corey James Fordham Minn. Ct. App. 2017
at 94; d 500, 512 (Minn. 2005) (stating that “[e]ven where witness credibility has been challenged, the jury may nonetheless believe the witness”).
State of Minnesota v. Diamond Lee Jamal Griffin 887 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Diamond Lee Jamal Griffin 887 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Allen Heidemann Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Allen Heidemann Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Patricia Ann Shepard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Patricia Ann Shepard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Blake Adam Schneider Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cornelius Kinte Payton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Blake Adam Schneider Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cornelius Kinte Payton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Chevaze Darrell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Chevaze Darrell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael Marshall Johnson, a/k/a Michael Tate Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael Marshall Johnson, a/k/a Michael Tate Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Vidale Lee Whitson, Vidale Lee Whitson v. State of Minnesota, C5-02-2108 876 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Vidale Lee Whitson, Vidale Lee Whitson v. State of Minnesota, C5-02-2108 876 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ryan James Sabot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Corey Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Corey Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
When there is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court “make[s] a painstaking review of the record to determine whether the evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, were sufficient to allow the jury to reach its verdict.”
State of Minnesota v. Ryan James Sabot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“[I]t is for the jury, not this court, to determine the credibility and weight to be given to the testimony of witnesses.”); (concluding that on review for sufficiency of the evidence “inconsistencies and related credibility determinations w
State of Minnesota v. Cedric Chappell, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cedric Chappell, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. K., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. K., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota law “presume[s] that the jury follows the [district] court’s instructions.”
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Marcel Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Marcel Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Saaundre Julian Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Saaundre Julian Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota law “presume[s] that the jury follows the [district] court’s instructions.”
Jeffrey M. Davies v. Waterstone Capital Management, L. P. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeffrey M. Davies v. Waterstone Capital Management, L. P. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(declining to adopt judicial-estoppel doctrine and noting that, even if adopted, it would only apply when a party has prevailed on a previous, inconsistent position).
State of Minnesota v. Willie Ellis Bardney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Willie Ellis Bardney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that prosecutorial misconduct may be cured by district court instruction).
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that a prosecutor’s improper question was harmless because a curative instruction was given and the fairness of the trial was not impaired).
State of Minnesota v. Mark Lee Whitcup Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mark Lee Whitcup Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Conrad Kegg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Conrad Kegg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Onokwuozo Onyemekeihia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Onokwuozo Onyemekeihia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Lynch Minn. Ct. App. 2014