Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hinton, 702 N.W.2d 278.

21 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Derrick Dandre Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A defendant may agree to waive a jury determination of a particular element of [an] offense by stipulating to it.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Chue Pao Her Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. David Anthony Tuinder Minn. Ct. App. 2026
and the respondent or person to be restrained knows of the existence of the order, violation of the order for protection is a misdemeanor.”)
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas John Wolter Minn. Ct. App. 2024
14(b) (2022), (d)(1); (setting forth analogous elements in considering a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge to a conviction under an earlier version of the statute), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Douglas Frederick Gratz Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Steven Edward Hansmann Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A defendant, however, “may agree to waive a jury determination of a particular element of the offense by stipulating to it.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Miguel Angel Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(noting that “[a] defendant may agree to waive a jury determination of a particular element of the offense by stipulating to it”), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Artis Iverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Artis Iverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(applying plain- error analysis to jury-trial waiver on stipulated elements); d 278, 281-82 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Rajab Ibn Dawun Abdul Jabbar Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rajab Ibn Dawun Abdul Jabbar Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-82 (Minn. App. 2005) (applying harmless-error analysis to erroneous stipulation to an element), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“A defendant may agree to waive a jury determination of a particular element of the offense by stipulating to it.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
But a “defendant may agree to waive a jury determination of a particular element of the offense by stipulating to it.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Fluker 781 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Fluker 781 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-82 (Minn.App.2005) (applying harmless-error test), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In Re the Welfare of J.C.P. 716 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Welfare of J.C.P. 716 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
at 2538 ; (“The United States Supreme Court recently renewed its commitment to the Sixth Amendment right of a defendant to have the prosecutor prove to the jury all facts legally essential to the punishment.”) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.