Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hanson v. Woolston, 701 N.W.2d 257.

29 citing documents.

Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance New Certificate of Title After Mortgage Foreclosure Sale Certificate No. 112938 – ... Minn. 2026
Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance New Certificate of Title After Mortgage Foreclosure Sale Certificate No. 112938 – ... Minn. 2026
728, 728–29 (Minn. 1915); 261, 263–64, 266 (Minn. App. 2005)).
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Weidner Apartment Homes v. B. F. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Weidner Apartment Homes v. B. F. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Standing is a threshold consideration in determining whether a litigant is entitled to have the courts determine the merits of a dispute.”
Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for an Order Directing Entry of New Certificate of Title After Mortgage … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al., Petitioners, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul , d 172, 177 (Minn. App. 2012) (associations must show injury-in-fact to its members to have standing); (injury-in-fact is concrete and actual or imminent).
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al., Petitioners, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul, (associations must show injury -in-fact to its members to have standing); (an injury-in-fact is concrete and actual or imminent).
St. Cloud Educational Rights Advocacy Council, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
An injury-in-fact is “a harm that is both concrete and actual or imminent.” (quotation omitted) , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Valerie R. LeMaster, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
LeMaster last argues that “[w]ithout a motion to intervene or motion to substitute, the court did not have personal jurisdiction over Fannie Mae.” Personal jurisdiction “refers to the court’s authority to bind the parties to the action.” d 257, 265 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Jay Nygard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
from changing his mind and seeking the court’s aid in recovering payment.” Hanson v. Woolston
Cleveland-Cliffs Minnesota Land Development, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
An injury-in-fact involves harm that is “concrete and actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.” Hanson v. Woolston , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Forslund v. State 924 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Forslund v. State 924 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
" Hanson v. Woolston , , 262 (Minn. App. 2005) (quoting Whitmore v. Arkansas , 495 U.S. 149 , 155, 110 S.Ct.
Fern Hill Place Retail Association, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Stat. § 317A.251 also identifies the duties of a nonpro fit corporation’s board of dire ctors, and charges directors to act “in a manner the director reasonably be lieves to be in the best interests of the corporation.” In order to establish standing, a litigant must demonstr ate “a harm that is both concrete and actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.” (quotations omitted).
A17-1552 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Plaza Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
An injury-in-fact consists of harm that is “concrete and actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Anthony Hernandez v. Minnesota Board of Teaching Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anthony Hernandez v. Minnesota Board of Teaching Minn. Ct. App. 2016
An injury-in- fact involves harm that is “concrete and actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Lynn D. Schwie v. Armco Unlimited, Inc., and Chicago Title Insurance Company as assignee of Countrywide Home Loans, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lynn D. Schwie v. Armco Unlimited, Inc., and Chicago Title Insurance Company as assignee of Countrywide Home Loans, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Waiver of personal jurisdiction occurs “when the party submits to the jurisdiction of the court by appearing or by otherwise invoking the court’s jurisdiction.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
267 (Minn.App.2005) (“A person who obtains an interest in property through the assignment of a void judgment may not acquire title as a third-party bona fide purchaser....
Graves v. Wayman 816 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Graves v. Wayman 816 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
C. Even if FMB Is a Bona Fide Purchaser, FMB Has No Interest in the Property “[T]he bona-fide-purchaser doctrine should not apply to create a title to land when there is a total absence of title in the vendor.” (noting that bona-fide-purchaser defense does not apply when transfer is based on void judgment), review denied (Minn. Oct.