A04-2071
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.
Cited by
- Jennifer Odegaard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- In the Matter of the Denial of Line of Duty Death Benefits for Dallas … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Jacob Pries, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Charles Andrew Herold, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Regina Gower, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Karen Marie Firman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Ann Massert, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Brandon Grim, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Robert C. Tengdin, Trustee of the Robert C. Tengdin Revocable Trust dated May 18, … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Isaac C. Johnson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Paul Boyum, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Sandra D’Antonio, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/ Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice