Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc., 741 N.W.2d 117.

108 citing documents.

Clarence Hightower, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Care, Inc., 128 (Minn. 2007) (concluding that, because Minnesota statutes “do not provide for employee vacation pay as of right,” the right to paid-time-off benefits are a matter of contract); (“An employer’s liability for employees’ vacation pay is wholly contr
Wilmington Trust, National Association, Minn. 2023
Care, Inc., d 117, 123 (Minn. 2007) (stating that contract provisions must not conflict with a statute); Am.
Joseph D. Roach, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Care, Inc. , (recognizing that when discretionary bonus is “earned” is defined by contract).
Minn. 2021
Care, Inc. , –23 (Minn. 2007) (reviewing a prior version of Minn. Stat. § 181.13 de novo) ; Martens v. Minn. Mining & Mfg.
R e s p o n d e n t , Minn. 2021
Court of Appeals Anderson, J. Minn. 2020
A19-1654 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Care, Inc., n.1 (Minn. 2007) (Page, J. dissenting) (“Here, there are no conditions precedent on the earning of vacation.”).
Robert Grado, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Donald Hall, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Care, Inc., 7 (Minn. 2007).
In re the Matter of: Esther Schmalz and the Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Human Services, Renville County … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Care, Inc. , d 117, 123 (Minn. 2007).
Dewey Hill III Townhomes Association, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Care, Inc. , d 117, 123 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Care, Inc., (“[We] will not disregard a statute’ s clear language to pursue the spirit of the law.”).
A18-0391 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
FR Holding, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.
LaFayette Temple, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Care, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Aeon, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017
On appeal, we “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.
Chrystal Gardner v. Accend Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Chrystal Gardner v. Accend Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Care, Inc., –28 (Minn. 2007).
Steven Abrahamson, Relators v. The St. Louis County School District, Independent School District No. 2142, Office of Administrative … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Steven Abrahamson, Relators v. The St. Louis County School District, Independent School District No. 2142, Office of Administrative … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Angela K. Schreader v. DC & D Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Above Summit Construction Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Angela K. Schreader v. DC & D Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Above Summit Construction Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Care, Inc., -26 (Minn. 2007) (stating the rule in the context of supreme court’s interpretation of Minn. Stat. § 181.13(a) and concluding that the statute must be strictly construed); Kvidera v. Rotation Eng’g & Mfg.
Lorraine White, Trustee for the Lorraine M. White Trust v. City of Elk River Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lorraine White, Trustee for the Lorraine M. White Trust v. City of Elk River Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association v. National Football League, Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association v. National Football League, Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Care, Inc., (“We construe statutes to effect their essential purpose but will not disregard a statute’s clear language to pursue the spirit of the law.”).
Tracie Erickson, Relators v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tracie Erickson, Relators v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2015
JAB, Inc., d/b/a Future Concepts Studio & Spa v. Sara Naegle 867 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
JAB, Inc., d/b/a Future Concepts Studio & Spa v. Sara Naegle 867 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We construe statutes to effect their essential purpose but will not disregard a statute’s clear language to pursue the spirit of the law.” Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc., - 23 (Minn. 2007) (quotation and citation omitted).
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 860 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 860 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A14-132), (A14-224) v. Angela Mary Lennartson, (A14-132), Katie Foss, (A14-224). 857 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A14-132), (A14-224) v. Angela Mary Lennartson, (A14-132), Katie Foss, (A14-224). 857 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Mario Vasquez, Relator v. Safe-Way Bus Co., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Mario Vasquez, Relator v. Safe-Way Bus Co., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A13-2176), GEICO Insurance Company, (A14-0167) v. Metropolitan Council, Lashandra Scott, (A13-2176), Adelfa … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Council 854 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Council 854 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Care, Inc., (stating that appellate courts review questions of statutory construction de novo).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A13-2176), GEICO Insurance Company, (A14-0167) v. Metropolitan Council, Lashandra Scott, (A13-2176), Adelfa … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Care, Inc., (stating that appellate courts review questions of statutory construction de novo).
State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr. 849 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr. 849 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education 844 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education 844 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2014