DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Timberlake, 744 N.W.2d 390.

310 citing documents.

  • State v. Brown 792 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Brown 792 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2011
    (reaffirming the interpretation of Minn. Stat. § 624.714 ).
  • State v. Doebel 790 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Doebel 790 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Hollins 789 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Hollins 789 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    The Minnesota Supreme Court has recognized that “the reasonable suspicion standard is not high.” (quotation omitted).
  • State v. Wiggins 788 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Wiggins 788 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    This is not a high standard, and we apply it in view of the totality of the circumstances from an objectively reasonable officer’s perspective
  • State v. Marinaro 768 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Marinaro 768 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    A defendant bears the burden of persuasion on a defense only if, first, the conduct prohibited by the criminal offense, “ ‘in itself, without the exception is ordinarily dangerous to society or involves moral turpitude’ ” and, second, “ ‘requiring the state to prove the acts would place an impossible burden on the prosecution.’” ().