Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Theis, 742 N.W.2d 643.

440 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Michael Robert Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Francis Holt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Francis Holt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A strong factual basis ensures that the defendant does not plead “guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.” (quotation omitted).
Scott Andrew Marcucci v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Scott Andrew Marcucci v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joe Maria Vento Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joe Maria Vento Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Although the fair and just standard “is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard, it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37, 91 S. Ct. 160, 167 (1970)); -61 (Minn. 1977) (recognizing the use of Alford pleas in Minnesota).
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “[a] defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
Robert William Silker v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robert William Silker v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Once a defendant pleads guilty, he “does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Edward Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Edward Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[C]areful 2 scrutiny of the factual basis for the plea is necessary within the context of an Alford plea because of the inherent conflict in pleading guilty while maintaining innocence.” -49 (Minn. 2007).
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Danny Lee Zinski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ofiong Louis Sanders v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Danny Lee Zinski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ofiong Louis Sanders v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A manifest injustice is established if a guilty plea is invalid, which means that the plea is not “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Dale Allen Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dale Allen Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Trent Johnson 867 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Trent Johnson 867 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dustin Alan Edsill v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dustin Alan Edsill v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Luis Esteban Pliego Cortes v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Luis Esteban Pliego Cortes v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Chauncey Lanell Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Chauncey Lanell Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea if “withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice,” or if the “defendant proves it is fair and just to do so.”
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[C]areful scrutiny of the factual basis for the plea is necessary within the context of an Alford plea because of the inherent conflict in pleading guilty while maintaining innocence.” -49 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Eric Peter Elijio Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric Peter Elijio Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Chuck Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Chuck Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Abshir Abtidon Barrow v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2015
Abshir Abtidon Barrow v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2015
Emmanuel Osei v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Emmanuel Osei v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“A proper factual basis must be established for a guilty plea to be accurate.” (quotation omitted)).
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 2015
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 2015
Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lynell Richard Ellison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015