Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Theis, 742 N.W.2d 643.
- State of Minnesota v. Titus Triston Miguel Mangun Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Titus Triston Miguel Mangun
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The fair-and-just standard is “less demanding” than the manifest- injustice standard, but it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a plea “for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota v. Morrell Grant
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
- State of Minnesota v. Joshua David Wipper Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Joshua David Wipper
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
- State of Minnesota v. Kelvin Lenar Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Kelvin Lenar Lee
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION “A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
- State of Minnesota v. Cody John Opheim Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Cody John Opheim
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION “A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
- Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
- Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
- Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee Allford Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee Allford
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1,] requires withdrawal where a plea is invalid.”
- State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
- Colleen Marie Berg v. Michael Vincent Flaherty Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Colleen Marie Berg v. Michael Vincent Flaherty
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 38, 91 S. Ct. 160, 168 (1970).
- State of Minnesota v. Larry Lee Hough Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Larry Lee Hough Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Paul Michael Baumchen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Paul Michael Baumchen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Casey James Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Casey James Pederson
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
- State of Minnesota v. Tylynne Lashawn Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Tylynne Lashawn Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Pov Beng Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Pov Beng Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Semaj Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Semaj Williams v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
any reason.” (quotation omitted).
- Karl Arthur Keene v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Karl Arthur Keene v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
because in both cases the plea ‘is not supported by the defendant’s admission of guilt.’” Williams, d at 12 () (citation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Tuquan Lee Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Tuquan Lee Smith
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that “defendant’s acknowledgment that the State’s evidence is sufficient to convict is critical to the court’s ability to serve the protective purpose of the accuracy requirement”).
- State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Although the fair and just standard “is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard, it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
- Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph Liebsch 872 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 2015
-
Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph Liebsch
872 N.W.2d 875
Minn. 2015
plea hearing, that the evidence the State would likely offer against him is sufficient for a jury, applying a reasonable doubt standard, to find the defendant guilty of the offense to which he is pleading guilty.” see Goulette, d at 761 (stating that a district court “should not cavalierly accept’-’ an Alford plea without verifying *880 that the factual basis for the plea is strong).
- State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Although the fair-and-just standard “is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard, it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Adaiah Deontraie Townsend 872 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Robert Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. William Terrell Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. William Terrell Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Adaiah Deontraie Townsend
872 N.W.2d 758
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This is a less demanding standard than the manifest- injustice standard, but it does not permit withdrawal of “a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).