Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. McArthur, 730 N.W.2d 44.
-
State v. Crane
766 N.W.2d 68
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
A prosecutor should not “refer to facts not in evidence,” and a prosecutor’s statements may not be “calculated to inflame the passions or prejudices of the jury,” (quotation omitted).
- State v. Tscheu 758 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 2008
- State v. Hughes 749 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 2008
-
State v. Hughes
749 N.W.2d 307
Minn. 2008
Such “evidence includes the number of wounds inflicted, infliction of wounds to vital areas, infliction of gunshot wounds from close range, passage of time between infliction of wounds, and a defendant’s concern with escape rather than with rendering aid to the victim.” (concluding there was sufficient evidence of premeditation where the victim was shot from behind, in the head, and from a distance of 12 inches or less).
- State v. Holliday 745 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 2008
-
State v. Holliday
745 N.W.2d 556
Minn. 2008
3 (quoting Moua, d at 39 ).
- State v. Wren 738 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 2007
- State v. Wren 738 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 2007