Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of McIntosh v. McIntosh, 740 N.W.2d 1.

28 citing documents.

In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of: Monica Medina Robinson v. Fannie Krienke Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of: Monica Medina Robinson v. Fannie Krienke Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of Ariana Williams and OBO Minor Child v. Santo Che Zarate Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of Ariana Williams and OBO Minor Child v. Santo Che Zarate Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of: Sheila Sophia Niaz, OBO C. A. N., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of: Heidi Kay Wiplinger obo minor children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
see Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd.
In re the Matter of: Gina Ann LaBlanc, and on behalf of Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Whether to grant relief under the Domestic Abuse Act (Minn. Stat. ch. 518B) is discretionary with the district court.”
In re the Matter of: Jennifer Lynn Gaughan, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of: Kimberly Ann Sobiech, and o/b/o Minor Children, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
see also Minn. Stat. § 518B.01 (2018).
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Sweep v. Sweep , see also McIntosh v. McIntosh
In the Matter of: Jessica Jo O’Leary, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court has “broad discretion in crafting and issuing orders for protection,” and the decision whether to grant relief under section 518B.01 is discretionary.
Kerry M. Mokalla, on behalf of A.M. and A.M. v. Mani M. Mokalla Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kerry M. Mokalla, on behalf of A.M. and A.M. v. Mani M. Mokalla Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Carrie Ann Seibert, individually and o/b/o C. A. A. and C. C. A. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Carrie Ann Seibert, individually and o/b/o C. A. A. and C. C. A. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that “[w]hether to grant relief under the Domestic Abuse Act .
In re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer v. Luke Stephen Klammer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer v. Luke Stephen Klammer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that “[w]hether to grant relief under the Domestic Abuse Act .
In re the Matter of: Cindy Jean Oberg obo minor child v. Gregory Brian Bradley 868 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Cindy Jean Oberg obo minor child v. Gregory Brian Bradley 868 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that granting relief under Minn. Stat. § 518B.01 is discretionary).
In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(ruling that the district court did not abuse its discretion by granting an extension of an OFP); see also Braend ex rel.
In re the Matter of: Cherelle Lee Schroeder v. Bladen Frederick Schroeder Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Matter of: Cherelle Lee Schroeder v. Bladen Frederick Schroeder Minn. Ct. App. 2014
OFP “Whether to grant relief under the Domestic Abuse Act (Minn. Stat. [§§ 518B.01- .02 (2012)]) is discretionary with the district court.” d 1, 9 (Minn. App. 2007).