Ball Ex Rel. Mancino v. Pear One, Inc.
Ball Ex Rel. Mancino v. Pear One, Inc., 726 N.W.2d 454 (Minn. 2007).
The holding in the court’s own words
We further conclude that relator has not overcome the presumption that Minn.Stat.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- State of Minnesota v. Lazarous Lazaro Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Mark Andrew Huyber Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Terence Duane Maurstad Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Christopher Don Boswell Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. DaJohn Cortez Yarborough Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Terry Lorenzo Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Scott Solon Schaefer-Bonovsky Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Samuel Morton Post, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Demetrius Antonio Wynne Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- , A22-0290 Minn. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Davion Lee Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- St. Louis County Thissen, J. Took no part, Moore, J. State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 18, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). We further conclude that relator has not overcome the presumption that Minn.Stat. § 176.183 (2004) is constitutional. Respondent is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees. BY THE COURT: /s/Lorie S. Gildea Associate Justice