Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Williams v. State, 760 N.W.2d 8.

129 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Ronnie Jo Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that a defendant who enters an Alford plea maintains his innocence, but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction); (reciting grounds for a Norgaard plea, including the defendant’s assertion of lack of memory on essential elements of the offense), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant 7 asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The plea 1 “A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” see State ex rel.
State of Minnesota v. Joe Maria Vento Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joe Maria Vento Minn. Ct. App. 2015
1 “A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 869 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 869 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
1 (“A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.”), review denied (Min
Danny Lee Zinski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Danny Lee Zinski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Trent Johnson 867 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Trent Johnson 867 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The adequacy of the factual basis usually is established by questioning the defendant to prompt him to explain the “circumstances surrounding the crime.” Williams 5 v. State, (quoting Ecker, d at 716), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Apr.
Dustin Alan Edsill v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dustin Alan Edsill v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Eric Peter Elijio Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric Peter Elijio Minn. Ct. App. 2015
to determine whether Elijio would be found guilty.” -14 (Minn. App. 2009) (concluding that statements in a complaint, combined with defendant’s partial recollection, established strong factual basis to support plea), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Daniel Justin Olson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Daniel Justin Olson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
–15 (Minn. App. 2009) (affirming denial of petition to withdraw guilty plea when defendant submitted no factual proof and plea petition countered any claims that plea was not voluntary or intelligent), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph McManus Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph McManus Minn. Ct. App. 2014
for the proposition that stress at the time of pleading and a limited period in which a defendant has to accept a plea do not provide the necessary factual support to invalidate a plea.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
−14 (Minn. 8 App. 2009) (holding statements in complaint combined with defendant’s partial recollection provide a strong factual basis), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Theis, d at 649; review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Gary Michael Veesenmeyer-Trojanowski Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gary Michael Veesenmeyer-Trojanowski Minn. Ct. App. 2014
1 In a Norgaard plea, a “defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” review denied (Minn. Apr.