Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Williams v. State, 760 N.W.2d 8.

129 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Elfonzo Dyrell Shelby, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Williams v. State , review denied (Minn. Apr.
Catherine Ann Moore, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Williams v. State , review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The factual basis is usually established by questioning the defendant to prompt him to explain the “circumstance s surrounding the crime.” Washington does not challenge his pleas to the other two offenses: attempted first-degree aggravated robbery (count five) and fleeing a peace officer (count eleven).
Nathan Christopher Braun, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
An “adequate factual basis” requires “two related components: [1] a strong factual basis and [2] the defendant’s acknowledgment that the evidence would be sufficient for a jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” -13 (Minn. App. 2009), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Ordinarily, an adequate factual basis is established by questioning the defendant and asking the defendant to explain in his or her own words the circumstances surrounding the crime.” Williams v. State , d 8, 12 (Minn. App. 2009) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Bradley D. Fordyce, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[A]n adequate factual basis” requires “two related components: [1] a strong factual basis, and [2] the defendant’s acknowledgment that the evidence would be sufficient for a jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” -13 (Minn. App. 2009), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
If substantial and compelling circumstances exist, making the case “atypical,” Taylor v. State , 9 (Minn. 2003), the district court “may reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Preston Ryan Lee, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Apr.
Malik Jordan Olsen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In this way, 9 -14 (Minn. App. 2009), in which this court reasoned that the complaint and the defendant’s admissions were sufficient to establish a strong factual basis for a Norgaard guilty plea.
Erick Lamont Lindsey, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Ordinarily, an adequate factual b asis is established by questi oning the defendant and asking the defendant to explain in his or her own words the circumstances surrounding the crime.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Markhel D. Franklin, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“The accuracy requirement is intended to protect the defendant from pleading guilty to a charge more serious than he or she could be convicted of were the defendant to go to trial.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Williams v. State , review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Ordinarily, an adequate factual b asis is established by questi oning the defendant and asking the defendant to explain in his or her own words the circumstances surrounding the crime.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
( ), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Ordinarily, an adequate factual basis is established by questioning the defendant and asking the defendant to explain in his or her own words the circumstances surrounding the crime.” (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-41 (Minn. 2003) (rejecting argument that “mental stress at the time of the plea[]” affected validity of the plea, when the argument contradicted the district court’s recollection of the plea hearing); (rejecting claim that guilty plea was invalid because “medication [defendant] was taking at the time of the plea hearing ‘distorted’ her mental focus and ‘clogged’ her thinking”), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Ordinarily, an adequate factual basis is established by questioning the defendant and asking the defendant to explain in his or her own words the circumstances surrounding the crime.” (quotation omitted) , review denied (Minn. Apr.
Herbert Eugene Pitts, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(citing State v. Ecker , ), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
–13 (Minn. App. 2009), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See -95 (Minn. App. 2005); -15 (Minn. App. 2009) review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Williams v. State , (“A plea constitutes an Alford/Goulette plea if the defendant maintains inno cence but pleads guilty because th e record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.
State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The “factual basis for a Norgaard plea is sufficiently established when the record clearly shows that in all likelihood the defendant committed the offense and that the defendant pleaded guilty based on the likelihood that a jury would convict.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gordon Ranniger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gordon Ranniger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Ecker, d at 717; review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Ammanuel Ray Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ammanuel Ray Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Court services did not complete a psychosexual ‡ “A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and [he] reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Donald Kalib John Nichols Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Donald Kalib John Nichols Minn. Ct. App. 2016
is a prison 1 “A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” see State ex rel.
State of Minnesota v. Scotty William Polchow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scotty William Polchow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See, (“The record also contains a copy of the complaint and defendant, by his plea of guilty, in effect judicially admitted the allegations contained in the complaint.”); (“[T]he sworn complaint, which was part of the record at the time of the plea and referred to at the plea hearing, summarizes witness testimony that showed, in all likelihood, that [defendant] committed both crimes.”), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. John Porter Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. John Porter Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
He requested a dispositional departure, citing the responsibility he took for his 1 “A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” (citing State ex rel.
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See, (“The record also contains a copy of the complaint and defendant, by his plea of guilty, in effect judicially admitted the allegations contained in the complaint.”); (“[T]he sworn complaint, which was part of the record at the time of the plea and referred to at the plea hearing, summarizes witness testimony that showed, in all likelihood, that [defendant] committed both crimes.”), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Scott Leithe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Scott Leithe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But Leithe provided the necessary assurance by 5 signing the plea petition, in which he avowed that he was “satisfied that [his] attorney ha[d] represented [his] interests and ha[d] fully advised [him].” –15 (Minn. App. 2009) (concluding that the district court did not err by “summarily rejecting” the defendant’s claim that her plea was involuntary in the face of her acknowledgements in her plea petition), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Karl Arthur Keene v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Karl Arthur Keene v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
6 “Ordinarily, an adequate factual basis is ‘established by questioning the defendant and asking the defendant to explain in his or her own words the circumstances surrounding the crime.’” (quoting Ecker, d at 716), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Ronnie Jo Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016