Cited by

–13 (Minn. App. 2009), the court of appeals stated that an “adequate factual basis” for a Norgaard plea requires two components: “a strong factual basis and the defendant’s acknowledgment that the evidence would be sufficient for a jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Steichen

See Williams v. State , (stating that postconviction petitioner not entitled to hearing if allegations lack factual support and are refuted by the record), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

1] 1 We note Hubbard’s point that “the factual basis for the DANCO violation was established exclusively through the district court’s leading questions.” Although the use of leading 8 On postconviction review, “a defendant is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing if [his] allegations lack factual support and are directly refuted by [his] own testimony in the record.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

But a petitioner “is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing if [his] allegations lack factual support and are directly refuted by [his] own testimony in the record.” Williams v. State , rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

Williams v. State , rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

An Alford plea is accurate when (1) the state demonstrates a “strong factual basis” for the offense, and (2) the defendant “acknowledge[s] that the evidence would be sufficient for a jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” -13 (Minn. App. 2009), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

See id.; -15 (Minn. App. 2009) (affirming the denial of a petition to withdraw a guilty plea when the defendant submitted no factual proof of her allegations that she suffered from nervous or mental conditions), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

An accurate Norgaard plea requires “a strong factual basis and the defendant’s acknowledgement that the evidence would be sufficient for a jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” 7 - 13 (Minn. App. 2009), rev denied (Minn. Apr.

-13 (Minn. App. 2009), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

When making an ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claim, a petitioner is “not entitled to an evidentiary hearing if [their] allegations lack factual support and are directly refuted by [their] own testimony in the record.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

“Ordinarily, an adequate factual basis is established by questioning the defendant and asking the defendant to explain in his or her own words the circumstances surrounding the crime.” Williams v. State , (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

1 In a Norgaard plea, “the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

Pursuant to the plea agreement, the district court stayed execution of 1 In a Norgaard plea, “the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

-13 (Minn. App. 2009), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

at 717; (noting that the supreme court suggested in Ecker “that a factual basis for a Norgaard plea is sufficiently established when the record clearly shows that in all likelihood the defendant committed the offense and that the defendant pleaded guilty based on the likelihood that a jury would con

the [s]tate presented evidence in the form of testimony from the officers, 1 “A plea constitutes an Alford/Goulette plea if the defendant maintains innocence but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

Fasthorse waived his right to have a jury decide whether the 1 In a Norgaard plea, “the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

“A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

And defendants are “not entitled to an evidentiary hearing if [their] allegations lack factual support and are directly refuted by [their] own testimony in the record.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

“A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

1 A defendant enters a Norgaard plea when he “asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

(citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 (1970)), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

“A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

tim one “to come to his bedroom.” Sanders told victim one that on September 2, 2021, he had placed a camera in her bedroom that recorded 1 “A plea constitutes an Alford/Goulette plea if the defendant maintains innocence but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

State v. Trott , d 248, 251 (Minn. 1983); see Williams v. State , rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

“A plea is intelligently made if the defendant understands the charges, understands the rights that are waived by pleading guilty, and understands the consequences of the plea.” Williams v. State , (citation omitted).

“A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.” , rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

However, the district court warned appellant th at if he violated any of the conditions of 1 “A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asse rts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient ev idence to obtain a conviction.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

“A plea is intelligently made if the defendant understands the charges, understands the rights that are waived by pleading guilty, and understands the consequences of the plea.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

An adequate factual basis for an Alford plea requires “two related components: a strong factual basis and the defendant’s ac knowledgement that th e evidence would be sufficient for a jury to find the defenda nt guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” -13 (Minn. App. 2009), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

“A plea is intelligently made if the defendant understands the charges, understands the rights that are waived by pleading guilty, and understands the consequences of the plea.” () , rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

Krasky first contends that his guilty plea was not intelligent because he has “below- average intellectual functioning and is a vulnerable adult.” “A plea is intelligently made if the defendant understands the charges, understands the rights that are waived by pleading guilty, and understands the consequences of the plea.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.

A defendant, however, “is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing if [their] allegations lack factual support and are directly refuted by [their] own testimony in the record.” rev. denied (Minn. April 21, 2009).

A defendant is not entitled to postconviction relief, or even an evidentiary hearing, “if [his] allegations lack factual support and are di rectly refuted by [his] own testimony in the record.” review denied (Minn. Apr.

7 -13 (Minn. App. 2009), review denied (Minn. Apr.

Jones’s at torney 1 “A plea constitutes a Norgaard plea if the defendant asserts an absence of memory on the essential elements of the offense but pleads guilty because the record establishes, and the defendant reasonably believes, that the state has sufficient evidence to obt ain a conviction.”

Williams v. State , review denied (Minn. Apr.