Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen, 781 N.W.2d 880.

47 citing documents.

, A25-1164 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Further, “[w]hen interpreting a contract, we must determine if the language is clear and unambiguous, meaning it has only one reasonable interpretation.” Halla Nursery
James P Gerchy, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Halla Nursery, d 880, 884 (Minn. 2010).
Jeffrey D. Kuhn v. Richard G. Dunn 8 N.W.3d 633 Minn. 2024
Jeffrey D. Kuhn v. Richard G. Dunn 8 N.W.3d 633 Minn. 2024
See Halla Nursery, (observing that “the terms of a contract are not read in isolation”).
Fitness International, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The contract must be read according to “the meaning assigned to the words and phrases in accordance with the 8 apparent purpose of the contract as a whole .” Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen , .
Athena 2004, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Contested Case Hearing Request by W. Lorentz & Sons Construction. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Paul, -44 (Minn. 1981); -92 (Minn. 1989); Halla Nursery, -87 (Minn. 2010).
BDS Laundry Management Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen , d 880, 884 (Minn. 2010).
Valerie R. LeMaster, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom 925 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2019
Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom 925 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2019
Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen , , 884 (Minn. 2010).
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Halla Nursery, (stating that interpretation of a contract is a question of law that is reviewed de novo).
Leland Bertsch, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The determination of whether a contract is unambiguous depends on the meaning assigned to the words and phrases in accordance with the apparent purpose of the con tract as a whole.” Halla Nursery
Charlotte Nelson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A contract is unambiguous when “it has only one reasonable interpretation.” Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen
In re the Marriage of: Heather Lee Burke, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bruce Township v. Kevin Schmitz, Nathan A. Baum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bruce Township v. Kevin Schmitz, Nathan A. Baum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anchor Bank, N. A. v. Matthew L. Gulbransen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining Mao Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining Mao Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Halla Nursery, (“[W]e review de novo the district court’s interpretation of [a] stipulation and judgment.”); Star Windshield Repair, Inc. v. Western Nat.
Anchor Bank, N. A. v. Matthew L. Gulbransen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The determination of whether a contract is ambiguous “depends on the meaning assigned to the words and phrases in accordance with the apparent purpose of the contract as a whole.” Halla Nursery
Storms, Inc. v. Mathy Construction Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Storms, Inc. v. Mathy Construction Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sandra Jean Lonneman v. Michael Itskovich Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sandra Jean Lonneman v. Michael Itskovich Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The determination of whether a contract is unambiguous 4 depends on the meaning assigned to the words and phrases in accordance with the apparent purpose of the contract as a whole.” Halla Nursery
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
See Halla Nursery, -85 (Minn. 2010).
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC, and third party v. Les Nielsen, third party 868 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC, and third party v. Les Nielsen, third party 868 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The determination of whether a contract is ambiguous “depends on the meaning assigned to the words and phrases in accordance with the apparent purpose of the contract as a whole.” Halla Nursery
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Duane A. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 55128 864 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Duane A. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 55128 864 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2015
See Halla Nursery, (“The (Footnote continued on next page.)
Michael A. Friedman, Richard J. Nigon and Geoff Hirman, as Trustees of the North Shore Pines Trust v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael A. Friedman, Richard J. Nigon and Geoff Hirman, as Trustees of the North Shore Pines Trust v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
See Halla Nursery, (“[T]he terms of a contract are not read in isolation.”).
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining Mao 854 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 2014
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
anties by reference, we construe them as one contract because the guaranties state that “[t]he Lender has refused to make the Loan unless this Guaranty is executed by the Guarantor and delivered to the Lender.” Appellate courts give effect to contract language that is “clear and unambiguous, meaning it has only one reasonable interpretation.” Halla Nursery
City of Duluth v. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 843 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2014
City of Duluth v. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 843 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2014
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Savela v. City of Duluth 806 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2011
Savela v. City of Duluth 806 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2011
proper interpretation of them is a question of law that is subject to de novo review, see Halla Nursery
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal 797 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 2011
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal 797 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 2011
5 But see Halla Nursery, (applying a different standard of review to a district court’s equitable determination when this court determined whether to apply equity principle to a new situation).