Cited by

3 At oral argument before this court, Martins acknowledged that he “messed up” in arriving late, leaving the hearing early, and failing to appear at the in-person hearing.

See, e.g. , Michael , d at 768 (imposing a 30-day suspension) ; Warpeha , d at 361 (imposing a 60-day suspension) ; In re Winter , , 470 (Minn. 2009) (imposing a 120-day suspension); In re Van Liew , , 758 (Minn. 2006) (order) (imposing a 90-day suspension).

See, -47 (Minn. 2012) (imposing a 60-day suspension for an attorney who made a false statement to the court of appeals and practiced law while suspended); d 463, 470 (Minn. 2009) (imposing a 120-day suspension for an attorney with a prior disciplinary history who made false statements to a tribunal and to another attorney); (imposing a 90-day suspension for an attorney who made false statements to a tribunal and failed to fi

(characterizing a false statement to a court as “prejudic[ial] to the administration of justice”).

See, -67 (Minn.2009) (affirming that respondent violated Rules 3.3(a)(1), 3.4(c), 4.1, and 8.4(c) and (d), MRPC, for filing a false motion with a tribunal); Houge, d at 335-37 (affirming that respondent violated in part Rules 3.3(a)(1), 4.1, 8.4(c) and (d), MRPC).