A08-2084 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Moore v. CAL SPAS OF MINNESOTA

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed May 5, 2009 · 764 N.W.2d 816

Cited by

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Dahir Abdow Noor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Jama 908 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Ishmael Roberts 876 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Warren Dean Schroyer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald William Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Javier Zapien-Arreola Minn. Ct. App. 2014
City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Cooperative Power Ass'n 830 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2013

all 13 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361

Opinion text

ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 13, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees. BY THE COURT: /s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice