DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Swenson v. Nickaboine, 793 N.W.2d 738.

74 citing documents.

Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Cloud, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo.” d 738, 741 (Minn. 2011).
John Joseph Wawersich, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Audrey Maria Negri, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
4 interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo.” d 738, 741 (Minn. 2011).
City of Hutchinson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo.” Cocchiarella v. Driggs
Yao Yamtse, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo.”
In re Bradley Stephen Boone for a Change Name 924 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Bradley Stephen Boone for a Change Name 924 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Cocchiarella v. Driggs , , 624 (Minn. 2016) ; see also Swenson v. Nickaboine , , 741 (Minn. 2011).
Carl Green, d/b/a Signature Capital, assignee of Kiersa Notz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo.”
John S. Drewitz, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Christensen 901 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Christensen 901 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo.”
A16-1372 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Interpretation of a statute pres ents a question of law, whic h we review de novo.”
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 738, 741 (Minn. 2011).
BMO Harris Bank, N. A., successor by merger to M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. City Center Development, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
BMO Harris Bank, N. A., successor by merger to M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. City Center Development, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 889 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 889 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In RE: The APPEAL FROM the FINAL ORDER OF the BOARD OF MANAGERS OF the BOIS DE SIOUX … 889 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In RE: The APPEAL FROM the FINAL ORDER OF the BOARD OF MANAGERS OF the BOIS DE SIOUX … 889 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Swanny of Hugo, Inc., d/b/a Carpenter's Steak House v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Swanny of Hugo, Inc., d/b/a Carpenter's Steak House v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Jolene Wuorenma Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Jolene Wuorenma Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 Nickaboine, d 1, 5 (Minn. 2008).
In re the Matter of: Cindy Jean Oberg obo minor child v. Gregory Brian Bradley 868 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Cindy Jean Oberg obo minor child v. Gregory Brian Bradley 868 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
ANALYSIS “Interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo.”
Ryan Contracting Company v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLP 868 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ryan Contracting Company v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLP 868 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo.”
Rahn's Oil & Propane, Inc. v. Ettel Logistics, Inc., ELI Logistics, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rahn's Oil & Propane, Inc. v. Ettel Logistics, Inc., ELI Logistics, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court rejected that argument based on the plain language of the statute, reasoning that the statute merely requires that assets were transferred to the insider “for an antecedent debt.” “Interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo.”
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo.”
Gale Allen Rachuy v. Duluth Police Department Property Room Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Jason Morgan Worsfold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Jason Morgan Worsfold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gale Allen Rachuy v. Duluth Police Department Property Room Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Harvey Ray Dupey v. State of Minnesota 855 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Harvey Ray Dupey v. State of Minnesota 855 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Allan D. Hauge v. James Schowalter, Commissioner of Management and Budget, State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Allan D. Hauge v. James Schowalter, Commissioner of Management and Budget, State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Although we review questions of statutory interpretation de novo, we are guided in doing so by our prior interpretations of a statute, see Riverview Muir Doran, 3 LLC v. JADT Dev.
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 738, 741 (Minn. 2011).
Mike Weinandt v. Burl Peckman, Markit County Grain, LLC, judgment creditor, The Harris Weinandt Living Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Mike Weinandt v. Burl Peckman, Markit County Grain, LLC, judgment creditor, The Harris Weinandt Living Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Webb Golden Valley, LLC, Evelyn Thomson v. State of Minnesota, Global One Golden Valley, LLC, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Webb Golden Valley, LLC, Evelyn Thomson v. State of Minnesota, Global One Golden Valley, LLC, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Interpretation of a statute presents a question of law that we review de novo.”
Nichols v. State, Office of the Secretary 842 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Clark v. Connor 843 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 2014