Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Patterson, 812 N.W.2d 106.

31 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Lennartson, d at 131; 527 (Minn. App. 2011), aff’d
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“[A] defendant may waive his right to the assistance of an attorney unhindered by a conflict of interest.” aff’d
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“The right to counsel of choice, however, is not unlimited.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Patterson , aff’d, see Minn. Stat. § 609.19, subd.
Joseph Thomas Saari, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Patterson , aff’d
Robert Norby, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“It is well settled that criminal defenda nts who do not require appointed counsel have a right to their counsel of choice.” (citing Powell v. Alabama , 287 U.S. 45, 53, 53 S. Ct. 55 , 58 (1932) (“It is hardly necessary to say that .
Pearson v. State 891 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2017
Pearson v. State 891 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2017
(applying the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct to determine whether an attorney had a conflict of interest in a criminal case).
Brent Lanier Lynch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Donell Holifield Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Donell Holifield Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In addition to assistance of counsel, a criminal defendant has a Sixth–Amendment “right to representation that is free from conflicts of interest.” Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261, 271, 101 S. Ct. 1097, 1103 (1981)
State of Minnesota v. Harrison William Rund Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Harrison William Rund Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that court of appeals is an “error correcting court”), aff’d
State of Minnesota v. Jeremiah James Shefelbine Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jeremiah James Shefelbine Minn. Ct. App. 2016
109, 112 (Minn. 2012) (concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion by disqualifying defendant’s attorney, despite defendant’s waiver of his right to conflict-free counsel in light of his attorney’s past representation of codefendant and state’s witnesses, and noting that “[o]n appeal from a co
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Earl Westergaard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Earl Westergaard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See State v. 8 Patterson, (stating that this court is an “error correcting court”) (quotation omitted), aff’d, Appellant was not seized when the officers shone their squad-car light on, and then parked their marked squad car near the front bumper of, the vehicle appellant was occupying.
Jose Armando Padilla v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jose Armando Padilla v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Devon Jarmon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Devon Jarmon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Fredrick Dewayne Hines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Fredrick Dewayne Hines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 106, 111 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Theodore Pierre Jerry 864 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Nicholas Aase Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Nicholas Aase Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A criminal defendant has the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel, including the right to “representation that is free from conflicts of 3 interest.” Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261, 271, 101 S. Ct. 1097, 1103 (1981)
State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co. 845 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2014
State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co. 845 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2014