A10-0809
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Wolf v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Wolf v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 787 N.W.2d 575 (Minn. 2010).
Cited by
- Richard Preston Blackwell v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Leroy Roderick Paul, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
- In re Petition for Reinstatement of Scott Selmer, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 156024 Minn. 2025
- Albert George McIntosh v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Minn. 2024
- Victor Cortez Shelton v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Orlando Omar Castillo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Terrance James Bowers v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Kenny Lee Reed, FKA: Gordon David Reese v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Jermaine Octavious Stansberry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. W. G. M Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Gary Lee Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 12, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees. BY THE COURT: /s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice