A10-1675
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Love v. Allina Health System
Love v. Allina Health System, 792 N.W.2d 815 (Minn. 2010).
Cited by
- State of Minnesota v. Randy Lee Chock Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Shawn Dione Davenport Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Elsa E. Segura Minn. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Frank James Bigbear Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Heidi Halvorson Rivers Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- State of Minnesota v. Ryan Richard Fenske Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Korie Jermaine Wash Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Vinson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Antonio Deshaun Collins Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Minn. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Nathan Anthony Janish Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota v. Tory Larae Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 1, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice