A10-1675
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Love v. Allina Health System
Cited by
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Shawn Dione Davenport Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Elsa E. Segura Minn. 2024
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Minn. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 1, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice