Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis, 817 N.W.2d 150.

216 citing documents.

Nathan Mead, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul, see also Kedrowski v. Lycoming Engines , ___ N.W.2d ___, ___, 20 19 WL 4282016, at * 8 (Minn. Sept.
Mark Kedrowski, Minn. 2019
Paul & Minneapolis, (explaining that the “underlying reliability, consistency, and accuracy of the theory” of an expert lie at “the heart of the foundational reliability question”); (requiring a proponent of scientific evidence to show that the “methodology used
Shamrock Sod & Landscaping, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
McGuire v. Bowlin 932 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2019
McGuire v. Bowlin 932 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2019
See Doe 76C v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis , , 163 (Minn. 2012) ("[W]e may affirm a grant of summary judgment if it can be sustained on any grounds."); Kafka v. O'Malley , 221 Minn. 490 , , 849 (1946) ("While a respondent cannot assign error upon appeal, decision in his favor may be predicated upon any ground appearing as a matter of law in the rec
State v. Harvey 932 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2019
State v. Harvey 932 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2019
Paul , , 165-68 (Minn. 2012).
City of Baxter v. City of Brainerd 932 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
City of Baxter v. City of Brainerd 932 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul , , 163 (Minn. 2012).
Nicholas Houchins, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Nell Mathews, et al. Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc. 925 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 2019
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc. 925 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 2019
Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis , , 163 (Minn. 2012).
Richard R. Ryan, Trustee for the Next-of-Kin of Debra Lynn Ryan, Decedent for Action for Death by Wrongful … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
W. J. A., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Aim Dev. (Usa), LLC v. City of Sartell 925 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Aim Dev. (Usa), LLC v. City of Sartell 925 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul , , 163 (Minn. 2012).
State v. Stewart 923 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Stewart 923 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul , , 164 (Minn. 2012).
In re 3M Bair Hugger Litig. 924 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re 3M Bair Hugger Litig. 924 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis , , 156 (Minn. 2012) ("The Frye -Mack standard governs the admissibility of expert testimony that involves a novel scientific theory.") (quotation omitted); Goeb v. Tharaldson , , 814 (Minn. 2000) (reaffirming Minnesota's adherence to the Frye -Mack general-acceptance standard and rejecting the less-strin
Tad Ware & Company, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
SM Investments, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Suncom, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co. 918 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co. 918 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul , , 164 (Minn. 2012).
George Lanoue, et al., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
, A17-1345 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A17-2040 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Mark Kedrowski, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul , –68 (Minn. 2012).
Meshbesher & Associates PA, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Rogers 912 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Rogers 912 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul , , 172 (Minn. 2012) (reasonable person standard is an objective standard); State v. Diede , , 843 (Minn. 2011) (reasonable articulable suspicion requires an objective justification).
Cindy Ly, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dr. Jonathan Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul 13 & Minneapolis, (w hen considering grant of summary judgment, appellate court need not adopt reasoning of district court and may affirm “summary judgment if it can be sustained on any grounds”).
FR Holding, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
KLC Financial, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
U. S. Bank National Association, successor by merger to U. S. Bank National Association ND, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul and Minneapolis, (citing Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd.
Crystal Grosch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. Erickson 899 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. Erickson 899 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Anita J. Howard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul , (considering evidentiary ruling first because the district court’s grant of summary judgment hinged on that ruling).
Pamela Ristau, on behalf of her minor child Mitch Ristau and Mitch Ristau, individually, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jane Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul , Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm , (involving allegations of sexual abuse); (involving sexual conduct between plaintiff and priest); review denied (Minn. Oct.
City Center Commons, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Accounts Receivable Services, LLC, as Successor in Interest to Allina Health System, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017