Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis, 817 N.W.2d 150.

218 citing documents.

Thomas R. Blanck, et al v. Rayvell Deprie Carter, Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance Company, EAN Holdings, LLC, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
SRRT Properties, LP, IDC Properties, LLC v. Nova Consulting Group, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul, (“Evidence is irrelevant if it lacks ‘any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.’” (quoting Minn. R. Evid.
Nathan Mead, Amy Mead v. BNSF Railway Company, Ture Lee on related appeal, and BNSF Railway Company, vs. … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul, see also Kedrowski v. Lycoming Engines , ___ N.W.2d ___, ___, 20 19 WL 4282016, at * 8 (Minn. Sept.
Mark Kedrowski, Minn. 2019
Paul & Minneapolis, (explaining that the “underlying reliability, consistency, and accuracy of the theory” of an expert lie at “the heart of the foundational reliability question”); (requiring a proponent of scientific evidence to show that the “methodology used
Shamrock Sod & Landscaping, Inc., et al v. Security State Bank of Fergus Falls, John Leonard Blume, Paul … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
McGuire v. Bowlin 932 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2019
McGuire v. Bowlin 932 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2019
See Doe 76C v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis , , 163 (Minn. 2012) ("[W]e may affirm a grant of summary judgment if it can be sustained on any grounds."); Kafka v. O'Malley , 221 Minn. 490 , , 849 (1946) ("While a respondent cannot assign error upon appeal, decision in his favor may be predicated upon any ground appearing as a matter of law in the rec
State v. Harvey 932 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2019
State v. Harvey 932 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2019
Paul , , 165-68 (Minn. 2012).
City of Baxter v. City of Brainerd 932 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
City of Baxter v. City of Brainerd 932 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul , , 163 (Minn. 2012).
Nicholas Houchins v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Nell Mathews, et al. Appellants v. City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Vanessa Abraham, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc. 925 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 2019
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc. 925 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 2019
Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis , , 163 (Minn. 2012).
Richard R. Ryan, Trustee for the Next-of-Kin of Debra Lynn Ryan, Decedent for Action for Death by Wrongful … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
W. J. A v. Patricia C. Johnson, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Terry M. Johnson, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Aim Dev. (Usa), LLC v. City of Sartell 925 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Aim Dev. (Usa), LLC v. City of Sartell 925 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul , , 163 (Minn. 2012).
State v. Stewart 923 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Stewart 923 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul , , 164 (Minn. 2012).
In re 3M Bair Hugger Litig. 924 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re 3M Bair Hugger Litig. 924 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis , , 156 (Minn. 2012) ("The Frye -Mack standard governs the admissibility of expert testimony that involves a novel scientific theory.") (quotation omitted); Goeb v. Tharaldson , , 814 (Minn. 2000) (reaffirming Minnesota's adherence to the Frye -Mack general-acceptance standard and rejecting the less-strin
Tad Ware & Company, Inc. v. Schwan’s Home Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
SM Investments, LLC v. Roger Erickson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Suncom, LLC v. Robert Feuling, d/b/a West Side Liquors of Sartell, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co. 918 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co. 918 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul , , 164 (Minn. 2012).
George Lanoue, et al v. Better Water Industries, Inc., Thein Well Company Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Justin D. Meyer (A17-1331), Justin D. Meyer, et al. (A17-1345) v. Fairview Health Services d/b/a Fairview Lakes Regional … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jenella Joyce Conda, as trustee for the heirs and next of kin of Ronald Eugene Conda v. Honeywell … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Mark Kedrowski v. Lycoming Engines, a division of AVCO Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul , –68 (Minn. 2012).
Meshbesher & Associates PA v. Lindell & Lavoie LLP Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Rogers 912 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Rogers 912 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul , , 172 (Minn. 2012) (reasonable person standard is an objective standard); State v. Diede , , 843 (Minn. 2011) (reasonable articulable suspicion requires an objective justification).
Cindy Ly v. North Memorial Medical Center Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dr. Jonathan Peterson v. Ruth Martinez, in her Official Capacity, et al., The Professional Renewal Center Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul 13 & Minneapolis, (w hen considering grant of summary judgment, appellate court need not adopt reasoning of district court and may affirm “summary judgment if it can be sustained on any grounds”).
FR Holding, LLC v. BA Halper, LLC, et al. and third party plaintiffs, vs. FactRight, LLC, et al., … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
KLC Financial, Inc. v. Plymouth Harvest Grill, LLC, et al., Aspen Showroom, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
U. S. Bank National Association, successor by merger to U. S. Bank National Association ND v. Anita Brochette … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul and Minneapolis, (citing Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd.
Crystal Grosch v. Soo Line Railroad Company, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2017
All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. Erickson 899 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. Erickson 899 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Anita J. Howard v. Shelly R. Svoboda, M. D., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul , (considering evidentiary ruling first because the district court’s grant of summary judgment hinged on that ruling).
Pamela Ristau, on behalf of her minor child Mitch Ristau and Mitch Ristau, individually v. Roger Ristau, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jane Doe v. Empire Entertainment, LLC, d/b/a The Pourhouse, metroConnections, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul , Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm , (involving allegations of sexual abuse); (involving sexual conduct between plaintiff and priest); review denied (Minn. Oct.
City Center Commons, LLC v. DeSoto Associates, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Accounts Receivable Services, LLC, as Successor in Interest to Allina Health System, Allina Health System, Nonparty Respondent v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP v. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2017