DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis, 817 N.W.2d 150.

218 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Minn. 2022
Paul , (discussing the prior version of Rule 702).
Voyageurs Retreat Community Association, et al v. City of Biwabik, a Municipal Corporation , and Town of White, … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Paul , (affirming summary judgment decision on grounds not addressed by the district court).
Tama May Boe Kerber v. Recover Health of Minnesota, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Troy David Mack v. Blake Azurin Martin, William Azurin Martin, Ian Alexander Stinson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Paul, see also Day Masonry v. Independent Sch.
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Sims Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Abdiaziz Mohamud Elmi v. Rukia Abdullahi Hashi Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Brandow Properties, LLC v. Katherine M. Melander, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Patti Amanda’s Inc. v. City of Biwabik, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Mark D. Island, et al v. Jason D. Ferguson, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Co. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kay L. Briden v. Transit Team, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Paul, d 150, 163 (Minn. 2012) (stating that when considering the district court’s ruling on summary judgment, we need not adopt the district court’s reasoning).
All, Inc. v. Christopher Hagen, Fair & Square Remodeling LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul , d 150, 163 (Minn. 2012).
James Johanning v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. L. R., T. D. C. and J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul , d 150, 164 (Minn. 2012).
Debra Lynn Johnson v. SICO America, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Everest Stables, Inc. v. Foley & Mansfield, LLP, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minnesota Bank & Trust v. 11 Water LLC, et al., David Jon Monson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A minor, by and through her mother and natural guardian, Amber Nelson v. Fairview Health Services d/b/a/ Fairview … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Ellsworth Fretham, et al v. City of Minnetonka Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Charlene Y. Latham v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
William O. Bradley v. Cody J. Haislet, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr. v. Paul Strong, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul , (quotation omitted).
City of Cambridge v. One Love Housing, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
William Miller v. Public Storage, a foreign Real Estate Investment Trust and third-party plaintiff, vs. Penelope Isleman, third-party … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nathan Mead, Amy Mead v. BNSF Railway Company, Ture Lee on related appeal, and BNSF Railway Company vs. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul & Minneapolis, (stating that exclusion of expert testim ony “lies within the sound disc retion of the trial court, and would be admissible at trial”).
Tunde Oni v. Target Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Scot A. Lacek v. Evolutionary Systems Corp Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Brian Madison v. Todd County, et al., Morrison County, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Andre Joseph Shafer Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul , 164 (Minn. 2012).
Travis Colsen v. Bright Birch, Inc. d/b/a Bright Birch Real Estate and d/b/a Bright Birch, a Minnesota corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul, (explaining that appellate courts may affirm summary judgment on alternative grounds).
Mark Lanterman, Computer Forensic Services v. Michael Roman Afremov Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Klingelhutz Judgment, LLC v. John D. Klingelhutz Minn. Ct. App. 2021
And we may affirm a grant of summary judgment “if it can be sustained on any grounds.”
Daniel Ashbach v. Warren Peterson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Independent School District No. 477 v. Midwest Asphalt Corporation, Court Surfaces & Repair, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Paul & Minneapolis, (explaining that the “underlying reliability, consistency, and accuracy of the theory” of an expert lie at “the heart of the foundational reliability question”)) (other citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jay Rodney Richard Clayborne Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Debra Sakrison v. City of Gilbert Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Paul, which means “[t]his court can, if it needs to, affirm summary judgment on alternative theories pres ented but not ruled on at the district court level,” Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Katie Aase v. Megan Hamilton Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Penelope Isleman, et al v. Public Storage Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Paul , (stating that an appellate court need not adopt a district court’s reasoning and may enter judgment on any appropriate legal grounds).
Phillip Musselman, et al v. Target Corporation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Kenny Alan Herold Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Paul & Minneapolis, (explaining that the “underlying reliability, consistency, and accuracy of the theory” of an expert lie at “the heart of the foundational reliability question”); (requiring a proponent of scientific evidence to show that the “methodology used [
Village Homes of Grandview Square II Association v. R. E. C., Inc. d/b/a Ron Clark Construction, et al., … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Melissa Casanova v. Tri-County Community Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Karen Mattinen v. Linda Kari, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Ramsey County Thissen, J. Minn. 2020
Paul , –68 (Minn. 2012) .
Joseph Z. Livingston v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Paul & Minneapolis , (M inn.
Colleen Cole f/k/a Colleen Wallin v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Midland Funding LLC, et al v. Joy Ford Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Francis J. Schumacher v. KMLE, INC., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Farmers State Bank of Trimont v. Joel S. Rabbe, Kristen C. Rabbe, Jon E. Rabbe, Debra A. Rabbe, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
William Jepsen, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Eric Parker Dean v. County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Tony Flattum v. Pro Tech Restoration, Inc., Brian Jovan Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Paul & Minneapolis, –68 (Minn. 2012)), review denied (Minn. Oct.