Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments Partnership, 827 N.W.2d 752.

70 citing documents.

In the Matter of a Petition for Clarification or Amendment of Appropriate Unit. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
P’ship, see also Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2024).
Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
P’ship, see also Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2024).
In the Matter of the Application of Anthony Allen Jessie Garnett for a Change of Name Minn. Ct. App. 2026
P’ship, 757 (Minn. 2013).
In the Matter of the Denial of Line of Duty Death Benefits for Dallas Edeburn. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
P’ship, see also Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2024).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake Swope Minn. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake Swope Minn. 2025
Christina Berrier v. Minnesota State Patrol 9 N.W.3d 368 Minn. 2024
Sean Michael Wocelka v. State of Minnesota 9 N.W.3d 390 Minn. 2024
Sean Michael Wocelka v. State of Minnesota 9 N.W.3d 390 Minn. 2024
P’ship, C-3 (Anderson, J., dissenting) (“[W]e must not look simply at a dictionary definition .
Christina Berrier v. Minnesota State Patrol 9 N.W.3d 368 Minn. 2024
P’ship, (holding that the State of Minnesota is an “owner” who may petition a municipality for an improvement to a public road).
William Findling v. Group Health Plan, Inc., d/b/a Health Partners and Regions Hospital, ... Minn. 2023
William Findling v. Group Health Plan, Inc., d/b/a Health Partners and Regions Hospital, ... Minn. 2023
P’ship, (Anderson, J., dissenting) (stating that we may use dictionary definitions to help us understand the meaning of a word if applying that definition makes sense in context).
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeals by Trinity Home Health Care Services and … Minn. 2023
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeals by Trinity Home Health Care Services and … Minn. 2023
P’ship, (Anderson, J., dissenting) (“[W]e must not look simply at a dictionary definition.
In the Matter of Keystone Township, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
P’ship, -57 (Minn. 2013).
Minn. 2022
P’ship, (s tating that “policy arguments do not provide a basis for us to ignore the application of the plain language” of a statute).
Perham Hospital District, Minn. 2022
P’ship., (“We do not resort to extrinsic sources when interpreting a statute unless the statute is ambiguous”).
Minn. 2020
P’ship, (“When legislative intent is clear from the statute’s plain and unambiguous language, we interpret the statute according to its plain meaning without resorting to other principles of statutory interpretation.”) But section 604.18, subdivision 2, is an unusual statute in that the language of the
Bruce Clark, et al., Minn. 2019
P’ship , (“We cannot add words of qualification to the statute that the Legislature has omitted.”).
Matter of Welfare of A. J. B. 929 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 2019
Matter of Welfare of A. J. B. 929 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 2019
P'ship , , 760 (Minn. 2013) (Anderson, J., dissenting) ("[W]e must not look simply at a dictionary definition ....
Heilman v. Courtney 926 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2019
Heilman v. Courtney 926 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2019
P'ship , , 755 (Minn. 2013).
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc. 925 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 2019
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc. 925 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 2019
P'ship , , 755 (Minn. 2013).
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
P'ship , , 755 (Minn. 2013).
Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC v. Comm'r of Revenue 916 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 2018
State v. Scovel 916 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
State v. Scovel 916 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
P'ship , , 760 (Minn. 2013) ("[W]e must not look simply at a dictionary definition....
A17-0903 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities Commission 899 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities Commission 899 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
P’ship, see also Minn. Stat. § 645.08 (1) (2016) (stating that when interpreting a statute, “words and phrases are construed ...
State v. S.A.M. 891 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2017
State v. S.A.M. 891 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2017
P’ship, ("When legislative intent is clear from the statute’s plain and unambiguous language, we interpret the statute according to its plain meaning without resorting to other principles of statutory inteipretation.”).
Gary Otremba, Heidi L. Moegerle v. City of East Bethel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gary Otremba, Heidi L. Moegerle v. City of East Bethel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Demetris L. Duncan v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections 887 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Demetris L. Duncan v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections 887 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 2016
County of Isanti v. Keith Allen Kiefer, and third party v. City of Ramsey, Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
County of Isanti v. Keith Allen Kiefer, and third party v. City of Ramsey, Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
P’ship, d 752, 757 (Minn. 2013).
In re the Welfare of A.S. 882 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Welfare of A.S. 882 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
P’ship, (quotation omitted).
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 877 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2016
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 877 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2016
Paek Saengkeo v. Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims 877 N.W.2d 568 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Paek Saengkeo v. Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims 877 N.W.2d 568 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr. 872 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr. 872 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 2015
P’ship, (applying a similar line of reasoning).
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond Struzyk 869 N.W.2d 280 Minn. 2015