Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Limmer v. Swanson, 806 N.W.2d 838.

21 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. O. and D. W., Commissioner of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. O. and D. W., Commissioner of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Drake Snell, et. al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Jessica Lin Love, n/k/a/ Jessica Lin Lopez Love, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A matter is “moot when an event occurs that makes a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of effective relief impossible.” (quotation omitted).
Cruz-Guzman v. State 916 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2018
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Antwone Ford, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, ex rel, Robert Young, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Dean, d at 5 ; Limmer v. Swanson
Minnesota Solar, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
See, (Anderson, Paul J., concurring) (explaining that there are occasions in which the judiciary must “stand down” in order to allow the other branches of government to “attempt to resolve a particular issue”).
In re the Custody of A.M.W. Kelly James Wadsen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Limmer v. Swanson , (stating that an issue is “moot when an event occurs that makes a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of effective relief impossible” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota, ex rel., Arturo Martinez, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A matter is “moot when an event occurs that makes a decision on the merits unnecessary o r an award of effective relief impossible.” (quotation omitted).
Range Development Company of Chisholm v. Star Tribune, Paul McEnroe 885 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Range Development Company of Chisholm v. Star Tribune, Paul McEnroe 885 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A matter may be dismissed as moot when “an event occurs that makes a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of effective relief impossible.” (quotation omitted).
Gale Allen Rachuy v. Duluth Police Department Property Room Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gale Allen Rachuy v. Duluth Police Department Property Room Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We generally dismiss a matter as moot when an event occurs that makes a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of effective relief impossible.” (quotation omitted).
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
899 (1885) (instructing courts to never "anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it"); (refusing to issue "an advisory opinion adjudicating separation of powers issues that are not currently active and may not arise in the future”).
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by