Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Klamar, 823 N.W.2d 687.

167 citing documents.

Mitchell Frank Mack v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (stating that two indicia of intoxication provided reasonable, articulable suspicion for a preliminary breath test); (holding that an odor of alcohol provides a lawful basis to continue a detention), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Garry Leroy Gehrke Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Garry Leroy Gehrke Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “[d]eference must be given to the district court’s credibility determinations.”
State of Minnesota v. Paul Richard Dehn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paul Richard Dehn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Sharleen Leslie Paulson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Sharleen Leslie Paulson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that the field sobriety test arguably is closely related to the initial justification for the stop—reasonable suspicion of impaired driving—but concluding that the driver’s bloodshot eyes and the odor of alcohol provided an independent basis for the
State of Minnesota v. Brittney Dominique McKinney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Brittney Dominique McKinney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“It is generally established that a seizure occurs when a police officer stops a vehicle.” (citing Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 653, 99 S. Ct. 1391, 1396 (1979)).
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Sue Thorne Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Sue Thorne Minn. Ct. App. 2014
times,” and, at the beginning of the squad video, drove her vehicle “very substantially into the fog or shoulder lane,” with the wheel “well over that line.” The district court credited the trooper’s testimony that appellant committed a traffic violation by swerving over the lanes of traffic, and “[d]eference must be given to the district court’s credibility determinations.”
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. May 16, 1986).
State of Minnesota v. Paul Joseph Cunningham Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Paul Joseph Cunningham Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Hoekstra v. Commissioner of Public Safety 839 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Hoekstra v. Commissioner of Public Safety 839 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“Deference must be given to the district court’s credibility determinations.” (affirming district court when “trial judge heard the conflicting testimony, observed the witnesses, and chose to believe respondent”).