Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Klamar, 823 N.W.2d 687.

167 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Paul Harvey McGee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael Jerald Mattison Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael Jerald Mattison Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Richard Lavern O�Gara v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Richard Lavern O�Gara v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that an officer appropriately administered a PBT based on the officer’s reasonable, articulable suspicion that the person had been driving, operating, or controlling a motor vehicle while impaired); (determining an officer’s “observation of two indicia of intoxication .
Carole Jean Halverson v. State of Minnesota, and State of Minnesota v. Carole Jean Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Carole Jean Halverson v. State of Minnesota, and State of Minnesota v. Carole Jean Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Reasonable suspicion justifies a seizure “so long as the facts support at least one inference of the possibility of criminal activity.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Jamal Poole Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Jamal Poole Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert David Stoneburner v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert David Stoneburner v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The factual basis required to justify an investigative seizure is minimal.” d 687, 691 (Minn. App. 2012).
Michael John Frank v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brian Albert Lacey Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brian Albert Lacey Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Not every interaction between the police and a citizen amounts to a seizure.”
Michael John Frank v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that administration of field sobriety testing was reasonable, based on an officer’s observations of odor of alcohol and defendant’s bloodshot and watery eyes); (citing Juncewski for the proposition that “[i]ndicia
State of Minnesota v. Travis Richard Otto Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Travis Richard Otto Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Deference must be given to the district court’s credibility determinations.”
Shannon Forstrom Walsh v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Shannon Forstrom Walsh v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that administration of field sobriety testing based on officer’s observations of odor of alcohol and Klamar’s bloodshot and watery eyes was reasonable); d 729, 730 (Minn. App. 1986) (stating that an officer may request a PBT on the basis of specific and
State of Minnesota v. Andrew John Wondrasek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Andrew John Wondrasek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The police may seize a person if the facts objectively “support at least one inference of the possibility of criminal activity.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Tony Luke Fisher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tony Luke Fisher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Faith Annette Jenson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Justin Glenn Joecks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Justin Glenn Joecks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that this court gives deference to a district court’s credibility determinations when reviewing a pretrial order on a motion to suppress evidence).
State of Minnesota v. Faith Annette Jenson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The district court credited the state’s evidence that the decision to have the vehicle impounded and inventoried “was a consequence of the facts that [Jenson] was being taken into custody and there was no one else available to assume responsibility for the car.” (stating that this court defers to a district court’s credibility determinations when reviewing a pretrial order on a motion to suppress evidence).
Randy Lee Torgeson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randy Lee Torgeson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that an officer appropriately administered field sobriety tests and a preliminary breath test because the officer had 3 reasonable, articulable suspicion that the person had been driving while impaired); (determining that an officer’s observation of two indicia of intoxication constituted reasonable, articulable suspicion to justify field sobriety tests and preliminary breath testing).
Alexander Nathan Davis v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Alexander Nathan Davis v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Benjamin David Telschow v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Benjamin David Telschow v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(determining an officer’s “observation of two indicia of intoxication .
Quentin Keith Orsten v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Quentin Keith Orsten v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that two indicia of intoxication—the odor of alcohol emanating from the driver and the driver’s bloodshot and watery eyes—reasonably justified intrusions in the form of field sobriety testing and a PBT); Hager v. Comm’r of Pub.
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Nathan Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Nathan Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(upholding expansion of stop when driver had odor of alcohol and bloodshot and watery eyes).
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Lamar Mobley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Lamar Mobley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ryan John Nordell v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ryan John Nordell v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that an officer appropriately administered field sobriety tests and a preliminary breath test because the officer had reasonable, articulable suspicion that the person had been driving while impaired); (determining that the officer’s observation of two indicia of intoxication constituted reasonable, articulable suspicion to justify field sobriety tests and preliminary breath testing).
State of Minnesota v. Logan Nicholas Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Logan Nicholas Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Deference must be given to the district court’s credibility determinations.”).
James Fletcher Cameron v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James Fletcher Cameron v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (determining that the trooper developed reasonable articulable suspicion to perform an initial stop and concluding that two indicia of intoxication reasonably justified field sobriety tests and preliminary breath testing).
Mitchell Frank Mack v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015