Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Martin v. Dicklich, 823 N.W.2d 336.

31 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: E. M. B., DOB February 14, 2014, Sharo’n Lily Isabella Mathison, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Qays Abdi Ahmed, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Estate of: Joann Roselia Gregory, aka JoAnn R. Gregory and aka JoAnn Gregory, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam Minn. 2020
d 336, 342 (Minn. 2012) (noting that “ some prejudice ” would re sult “ due to the expense 11 incurred in reprinting ballots ” but the “paramount interest of voters , who are entitled to a ballot that accurately identifies the candidates actually running for office,” outweighed that result); Pawlenty, d at 3
White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res. 928 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res. 928 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Martin v. Dicklich , , 345 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(expression of one thing is exclusion of the other); (a statute should be interpreted whenever possible to give effect to all of its provisions).
Trooien v. Simon 918 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 2018
Trooien v. Simon 918 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 2018
Martin v. Dicklich , , 342 (Minn. 2012).
Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 899 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 2017
State v. Boecker 893 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 2017
State v. Boecker 893 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 2017
BMO Harris Bank, N. A., successor by merger to M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. City Center Development, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
BMO Harris Bank, N. A., successor by merger to M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. City Center Development, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Monaghen v. Simon 888 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 2016
Monaghen v. Simon 888 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 2016
In RE: The APPEAL FROM the FINAL ORDER OF the BOARD OF MANAGERS OF the BOIS DE SIOUX … 889 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In RE: The APPEAL FROM the FINAL ORDER OF the BOARD OF MANAGERS OF the BOIS DE SIOUX … 889 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Laches is an equitable doctrine applied to prevent one who has not been diligent in asserting a known right from recovering at the expense of one who has been prejudiced by the delay.” (quotation omitted).
Moulton v. Simon 883 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2016
Moulton v. Simon 883 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2016
-40 (Minn.2012) (denying the Secretary of State’s motion to be dismissed as a respondent based on the Secretary’s “interests in ballot preparation and election administration” that are implicated by a petition requesting relief concerning a particular ballot).
Prime Security Bank v. A&G Investments, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Prime Security Bank v. A&G Investments, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
Christianson v. Henke 831 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2013
Christianson v. Henke 831 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2013
Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M.
Carlson v. Ritchie 830 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 2013
Carlson v. Ritchie 830 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 2013
(recognizing that “the orderly administration of elections ...
Fosle v. Ritchie 824 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2012
Fosle also asserts that because he admittedly was not served with a copy of the petition in Martin , his name should be added to the November 2012 general election ballot as “a matter of fairness, equity, and consistency.” Our scheduling order required the Martin petitioners to serve a copy of the petition on “all other candidates for state representative, District 7B.” Martin , Order at 2 (Minn. filed Sept.