Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hooper v. State, 838 N.W.2d 775.

119 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. David William Reynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. David William Reynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[A] defendant’s failure to seek a writ of prohibition constitutes a waiver of further appellate review ‘when the issue involves the right of peremptory removal.’” n.4 (Minn. 2013) (emphasis omitted) (-05 (Minn. 2008)).
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The Knaffla rule provides that when a petition for postconviction relief follows a direct 10 appeal of a conviction, all claims raised in the direct appeal and all claims of which the defendant knew or should have known at the time of the direct appeal are procedurally barred.” (quotation omitted).
Brian Keith Hooper v. State of Minnesota 888 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 2016
Brian Keith Hooper v. State of Minnesota 888 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 2016
See State v. Hooper (Hooper I), d 31 (Minn. 2000); State v. Hooper (Hooper II), State v. Hooper (Hooper III)
In re the Marriage of: Anita Jurevica v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Anita Jurevica v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A motion to remove for cause is committed to the discretion of the [district] court and [we] will reverse only for an abuse of that discretion.” d 775, 790 (Minn. 2013) (quotation omitted).
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
Thomas Lee Fairbanks v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2016
Thomas Lee Fairbanks v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2016
n.2 (Minn. 2013) (collecting cases that have declined to decide whether the exceptions to the Knaffla bar survived the passage of Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
Ta-Raj Tondell Satari Benness v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ta-Raj Tondell Satari Benness v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The Knaffla rule provides that when a petition for postconviction relief follows a direct appeal of a conviction, all claims raised in the direct appeal and all claims of which the defendant knew or should have known at the time of the direct appeal are procedurally barred.” (quotation omitted).
Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2016
Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
see also State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2016
Act of June 2, 2005, ch. 136, art. 14, § 12, 2005 Minn. Laws 901, 1097; see Williams, d at 318 n.2; n.2 (Minn. 2013); n.3 (Minn. 2013).
Robert Patrick Butters v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert Patrick Butters v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Baron Montero Jones v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Baron Montero Jones v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(noting that the postconviction act states “that the postconviction remedy ‘takes the place of any other common law .
Laurie Lea Oliveira v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Laurie Lea Oliveira v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(concluding that district court did 4 not abuse its discretion by deciding that petitioner’s postconviction claim was barred by the Knaffla rule).
Lovell Nahmor Oates v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lovell Nahmor Oates v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
4(a); d 775, 780-82 (Minn. 2013).
Jedidiah Dean Troxel v. State of Minnesota 875 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2016
Jedidiah Dean Troxel v. State of Minnesota 875 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2016
we declined to resolve whether the Dahlin II forfeiture rule extends to for-cause removal requests.
Keith Richard Rossberg v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 2016
Keith Richard Rossberg v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 2016
d 775, 790 (Minn. 2013).
State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[T]he mere fact that a party declares a judge partial does not in itself generate a reasonable question as to the judge’s impartiality.” 4 (Minn. 2013) (quotation omitted), cert.
Darryl Colbert v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 2015
Darryl Colbert v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 2015
Aka Lawrence Fualefeh v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Aka Lawrence Fualefeh v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion by deciding that petitioner’s postconviction claim was barred by Knaffla rule), cert.
State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota 869 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2015
Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota 869 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2015
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique Finch 865 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique Finch 865 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2015
“[A] defendant’s failure to seek a writ of prohibition constitutes waiver of further appellate review ‘when the issue involves the right of peremptory removal.’ ” n.4 (Minn. 2013) (-05 (Minn. 2008)).
Kodjo Agbelengeor Anyide-Ocloo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kodjo Agbelengeor Anyide-Ocloo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We review the denial of a postconviction evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion,” but resolve any doubts about whether to conduct an evidentiary hearing in favor of the petitioner