Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hooper v. State, 838 N.W.2d 775.

119 citing documents.

Carlos Heard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Carlos Heard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kyle Richard Greene v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kyle Richard Greene v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Pedro Maldono Rodriguez, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Pedro Maldono Rodriguez, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We recognize the following two exceptions to an otherwise Knaffla- barred claim: “if (1) the defendant presents a novel legal issue or (2) the interests of justice require the court to consider the claim.” (quotation omitted).
Laura Barreto Renteria v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Laura Barreto Renteria v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate courts review the denial of evidentiary hearings on postconviction-relief petitions “for an abuse of discretion.” d 775, 786 (Minn. 2013).
Steven David Pawliszko v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Steven David Pawliszko v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
–08 (Minn. App. 2011), aff’d, n.4 (Minn. 2013) (noting that failure to seek a writ of prohibition waives an issue involving peremptory removal in a postconviction context).
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2014
Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2014
Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2014
n.2 (Minn. 2013) (declining to decide what effect, if any, the 2005 amendments had on the Knaffla rule and its exceptions).
State of Minnesota v. Antoine Rumel Little 851 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Antoine Rumel Little 851 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2014
2 , 786 n. 1 (Minn.2013) (explaining that the court did not need to decide whether the harmless error or plain error standard applied because the defendant was entitled to relief under either standard).
Michael Frederick Schmidt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Frederick Schmidt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ineffective assistance of appellate/trial counsel Appellate courts review the denial of evidentiary hearings on postconviction-relief petitions for an abuse of discretion.2
Washington v. State 845 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Washington v. State 845 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2014