Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Koski v. Johnson, 837 N.W.2d 739.

20 citing documents.

All In Sober Living, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
3 Beaulieu’s rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Lisa Danielle Labok. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(in the context of a landlord-tenant dispute, rejecting substantial compliance in favor of strict compliance with statute concerning service of summons), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
Walter Smith v. Eric A. Johnson, Steven Scott Properties Management, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Walter Smith v. Eric A. Johnson, Steven Scott Properties Management, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Absent proper service of process or a waiver thereof, the district court must dismiss the action.” (quotation 4 omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State Farm cites our caselaw holding that other service statutes require “strict compliance, not merely substantial compliance.” (discussing eviction-summons statute, Minn. Stat. § 504B.331 (2012)), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
2913 29th Avenue South LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Cloud, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Sara Corinne Kysylyczyn, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Absent proper service of process or a waiver thereof, the district court must dismiss the action.” d 739, 742 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Dec.
Tammy Kirkpatrick, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(noting that without proper service of process, a district court must dismiss an action), review denied (Minn. Dec.
Sharon Anne Johnson v. Paul Jonathan Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sharon Anne Johnson v. Paul Jonathan Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Koski v. Johnson (Koski I), review denied (Minn. Dec.
Paul Koski v. Sharon Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Paul Koski v. Sharon Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Dec.
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (“When a party substantially complies with [rule] 4, actual notice of the summons will subject a defendant to the jurisdiction of the court.”) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. Fordyce Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. Fordyce Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Dec.
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Compare Minn. Stat. § 580.03, with Minn. Stat. § 504B.331(a)-(d) (2012) (stating that in situations where the occupant cannot be found, the summons may be left at the defendant’s last place of abode with a person of suitable age and discretion or the summons may be posted in a conspicuous place on the 6 property); -45 (Minn. App. 2013) (interpreting Minn. Stat. § 504B.331), review denied (Minn. Dec.