Cited by

See Webb Golden Valley, (instructing that the appellant “must establish an injury-in-fact to have standing”).

Generally, “[a] party has standing when (1) the party has suffered an injury-in- fact, or (2) the party is the beneficiary of a legislative enactment granting standing.” Webb Golden Valley

action and that differs from injury to the interests of other citizens generally.” Webb Golden Valley, (quotation omitted).

“Standing is a legal requirement that a party have a sufficient stake in a justiciable controversy to seek relief from a court.” (citing Sierra Club v. Morton , 405 U.S. 727, 731-32 (1972)); Webb Golden Valley

4 “To have standing, a party must have a sufficient stake in the controversy to seek relief from the court so that the issues before the court will be vigorously and adequately presented.” Webb Golden Valley, (quotation omitted).

An “injury-in-fact,” in turn, refers to a “concrete and particularized invasion of a legally protected interest.” Webb Golden Valley, (quotation omitted).

See Webb Golden Valley, (stating that plaintiff-appellant “must establish an injury- in-fact to have standing”); accord Murthy v. Missouri, 603 U.S. 43, 58 (2024) (stating that a plaintiff “bears the burden of establishing standing as of the time she brought the lawsuit and maintaining it thereafter” (quotation omitted))

Standing requires that “(1) the party has suffered an injury-in-fact, or (2) the party is the beneficiary 12 of a legislative enactment granting standing.” Webb Golden Valley

3 Standing requires a party to “ have a sufficient stake in the controversy to seek relief from the court.” Webb Golden Valley

“To have standing, a party must have a sufficient stake in the controversy to seek relief from the court so that the issues before the court will be vigorously and adequately presented.” Webb Golden Valley, (quotation omitted).

6 review a “district court’s order requiring a surety bond for an abuse of discretion.” Webb Golden Valley

A party has 6 standing when it has “a sufficient stake in the controversy to seek relief from the court.” Webb Golden Valley

Generally, “[a] party has standing when (1) the party has suffered an injury-in- fact, or (2) the party is the beneficiary of a legislative enactment granting standing.” Webb Golden Valley

To have standing, “a party must have a sufficient stake in the controversy to seek relief from the court.” Webb Golden Valley

“A party has standing when (1) the party has suffered an injury-in-fact, or (2) the party is the beneficiary of a legislative enactment granting standing.” Webb Golden Valley, LLC v. State

“A party has standing when (1) the party has suffered an injury-in-fact, or (2) the party is the beneficiary of a legislative enactment granting standing.” Webb Golden Valley

10 suffered an injury-in-fact, or (2) the party is the beneficiary of a legislative enactment granting standing.” Webb Golden Valley

Webb Golden Valley, LLC v. State

Webb Golden Valley, LLC v. State

Accordingly, LaPlant “must articulate a legally cognizable inte rest that it has suffered because of the [respondents’] action[s] and that differs from injury to the interests of other citizens generally.” Webb Golden Valley, (quotation omitted).

Webb Golden Valley, LLC v. State , , 693 (Minn. 2015).

See Webb Golden Valley, (surety bond); Carlson v. Mixell , (injunction bond); (court’s waiver of a bond).

Under Minnesota law, “[sjtanding is acquired in two ways: either the plaintiff has suffered some ‘injury-in-fact,’ ” Gillette, d at 783 (alteration in original)- (quotation omitted), defined as “a concrete and particularized invasion of a legally protected interest,” Webb Golden Valley, (quotation omitted), “or the plaintiff is the beneficiary of some legislative enactment granting standing,” Gillette, d at 783 - 84 (quotation omitted).