Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette Nelson, 866 N.W.2d 901.

17 citing documents.

Nicole Blissenbach, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of Minnesota v. Quotable Kids Pediatric Therapy Clinic, PLLP, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Nelson 6 v. Nelson, (stating that we enforce the plain language of a statute).
Hibbing Taconite Company v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
Charlene Karen Jundt v. Marcus Edward Jundt Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Charlene Karen Jundt v. Marcus Edward Jundt Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 901, 903 (Minn. 2015) We interpret Minn. Stat. § 548.091, subd.
Justin Thomas Skyberg v. Danielle Christen Orlich, County of Sherburne, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Lindsay Rae Shelltrack-Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted) .
In re Custody Petition of: Dominic Jerome Sublet v. Lori Catherine Schulz Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
In re: the Petition of A. M. G. and J. L. G. to Adopt C. A. R., L. … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bridge Investments, LLC v. Lowry Ridge Townhomes Association, LLP, Richard W. Stanek, in his official capacity as Sheriff … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s ro le is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
Diane Pettit, as Trustee of the Alan W. Pettit Marital Trust A v. Mary J. Spethmann Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity , the court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
The County of Hennepin by Hennepin County Attorney Michael Freeman v. 6131 Colfax Lane, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Sandra Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Marriage of Medvedovski v. Medvedovski 903 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marriage of Medvedovski v. Medvedovski 903 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Benjamin Robert Lewis v. Elle Hawkinson Frane, f/k/a Michelle Marie Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 901, 903 (Minn. 2015).
Marjorie A. Gomes v. James D. Meyer, County of Clay, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Ind.