Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette Nelson, 866 N.W.2d 901.

17 citing documents.

Nicole Blissenbach, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Nelson 6 v. Nelson, (stating that we enforce the plain language of a statute).
Hibbing Taconite Company, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
Charlene Karen Jundt v. Marcus Edward Jundt Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Charlene Karen Jundt v. Marcus Edward Jundt Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 901, 903 (Minn. 2015) We interpret Minn. Stat. § 548.091, subd.
Justin Thomas Skyberg, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted) .
In re Custody Petition of: Dominic Jerome Sublet, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
In re: the Petition of A. M. G. and J. L. G. to Adopt C. A. R., L. … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bridge Investments, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s ro le is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
The County of Hennepin by Hennepin County Attorney Michael Freeman, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Diane Pettit, as Trustee of the Alan W. Pettit Marital Trust A, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“If the plain language of a statute is clear and free from ambiguity , the court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
Marriage of Medvedovski v. Medvedovski 903 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marriage of Medvedovski v. Medvedovski 903 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Benjamin Robert Lewis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 901, 903 (Minn. 2015).
A16-1612 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Ind.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by